MASSIVE NEWS TRUMP RELEASES SH0CKING ANNOUNCEMENT ABOUT ROBERT MUELLER
ONE QUESTION DOMINATED SPECIAL COUNSEL ROBERT MUELLER'S INVESTIGATION .
WOULD THE SPECIAL COUNSEL CHARGE TRUMP WITH ANY KIND OF CRIMES ?
NOW A SHOCKER REPORT JUST EMERGED ABOUT WHEN ROBERTBMUELLER STRATEGIES TO EXPOSE WHETHER
HE IS INDICTING THE PRESIDENT TRUMP.
THE ROBERT MUELLER WITCH HUNT DRAGGED ON FOR ALMOST 18 MONTHS .
THE SPECIAL COUNSEL ROBERT MUELLER CAUSED A SLEW OF GUILTY PLEAS FOR PROCESS CRIMES
ABOUT PRODUCING FAKE STATEMENTS .
BUT ROBERT MUELLER HAS YET TO GENERATE A SMOKING GUN SHOWING COLLUSION WITH THE RUSSIANS OR
IMPLICATING DONALD TRUMP IN A CRIME .
EVEN THOUGH THESE TYPES OF FACTS ARE GAZING EVERY PERSON IN THE FACE , ROBERT MUELLER'S
DEFENDERS IN THE BOGUS NEWS MASS MEDIA , THE DEMOCRAT PARTY , AND NEVER-TRUMP REPUBLICANS
HAVE STATED THAT ROBERT MUELLER HASN'T PRESENTED ALL HIS CARDS YET .
THEY'VE HELD OUT HOPE THAT ROBERT MUELLER WILL LAUNCH A STUNNING FINAL REPORT SHOWING
THAT TRUMP WAS A CRIMINAL AND A TRAITOR .
NOW IT SEEMS THE RUBBER IS ABOUT TO MEET THE ROAD .
NBC NEWS STORIES ROBERT MUELLER IS PREPARING TO PUBLISH HIS FINAL REPORT TO THE JUSTICE
DEPARTMENT IN MID-FEBRUARY .
AT THAT POINT , IT WILL BE UP TO WHOEVER IS OVERSEEING THE ROBERT MUELLER INVESTIGATION
– RIGHT NOW THAT IS ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL MATT WHITAKER – TO GET THE REPORT PUBLIC
.
ROBERT ?MUELLER IS ANTICIPATED TO FABRICATE A REPORT THAT INVOLVES TRUMP HAS ALL SORTS
OF FOUL DEEDS .
THE SPECIAL COUNSEL ROBERT MUELLER HAS NO PROOF OF ANY MISCONDUCT , BUT PROSECUTORS
HAVE A WAY OF CRAFTING NARRATIVES THAT INVOLVES INNOCENT MEN AS GUILTY .
CRITICS THINK ROBERT MUELLER WILL STATE THAT , HOWEVER THERE WAS NO PROOF OF COLLUSION
, THE AMOUNT OF DONALD TRUMP ASSOCIATES WHO LIED TO INVESTIGATORS IMPEDED HIS HUNT FOR
EVIDENCE THAT DONALD TRUMP WAS A TRAITOR .
DONALD ?TRUMP LOVERS ALSO ANTICIPATE ROBERT MUELLER TO TAKE THE PRESIDENT'S LEGAL AND
LEGITIMATE BUSINESS DEALINGS – FOR EXAMPLE THE TRUMP TOWER PROJECT IN MOSCOW – AND
FRAME IT AS A NEFARIOUS FRAUD THAT WOULD HAVE ALLOWED RUSSIANS TO SEND MONEY INTO HIS BANK
ACCOUNTS IN EXCHANGE FOR POSITIVE POLICY OUTCOMES . DONALD
ALL OF THIS IS FICTION , BUT ROBERT MUELLER IS AWARE OF HIS JOB IS NOT TO WRITE A REPORT
THAT CLEARS THE PRESIDENT .
ROBERT ?MUELLER'S JOB IS TO GIVE POLITICAL COVER FOR AN IMPEACHMENT EFFORT IN 2019 .
THAT'S EXACTLY WHY CRITICS ASSUME ROBERT MUELLER TO PRESENT A REPORT THAT PAINTS A
HIGHLY NEGATIVE PICTURE OF TRUMP , HIS CONDUCT , AND HIS ASSOCIATES .
IT DOES NOT MATTER THAT ROBERT MUELLER DISCOVERED NO PROOF OF RUSSIAN COLLUSION – WHICH WAS
WHAT HE WAS INITIALLY ASSIGNED TO INVESTIGATE – THE SPECIAL COUNSEL WILL JUST BURY THAT
FACT DEEP IN HIS REPORT WITH THE INFORMATION THAT THE FAKE NEWS MASS MEDIA WILL COVER UP
THIS VITAL TRUTH .
EVEN THOUGH THIS REPORT IS PROVIDED IN SECRET TO THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE , THERE IS A
100 PERCENT CHANCE IT WILL BE MADE OPEN PUBLIC .
EITHER WHOEVER IS IN CHARGE OF THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT WILL MAKE IT AVAILABLE TO THE OPEN
PUBLIC , OR THE NEW DEMOCRAT MOST IN THE HOUSE WILL SUBPOENA IT AND THEN LEAK THE REPORT
.
DONALD ?TRUMP LOVERS CAN ALSO ANTICIPATE DEMOCRATS TO CALL ROBERT MUELLER TO TESTIFY TO PRODUCE
A PUBLIC SPECTACLE TO HYPE IMPEACHMENT CHAT .
ROBERT ?MUELLER'S REPORT WILL GIVE AN CHANCE FOR THE FAKE NEWS MASS MEDIA TO KEEP ON THEIR
"TRUMP IN CRISIS" MEME .
EVEN THOUGH THE CRUX OF THE REPORT WILL VINDICATE DONALD TRUMP – ROBERT MUELLER WILL REPORT
NO PROOF OF RUSSIAN COLLUSION – THE MASS MEDIA WILL SEIZE ON ROBERT MUELLER'S TRIES
TO TURN TRUMP'S ROUTINE BEHAVIOUR INTO A POLITICAL SCANDAL TO REQUIRE CONGRESS TAKE
OUT THE PRESIDENT FROM OFFICE .
WE WILL KEEP YOU UP TO DATE ON ANY NEW IMPROVEMENTS IN THIS ONGOING STORY .
HAS THE SUPREME COURT ALREADY DECIDED THE WALL CASE?
WE'LL "SEE YOU IN COURT."
SO SAID CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOM HOURS AFTER PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP SIGNED A PROCLAMATION
OF EMERGENCY TO REDIRECT FUNDS TO A SOUTHERN BORDER WALL WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CONGRESS.
WHAT IF THE SCRIPT AND THE ENDINGS FOR THESE LAWSUITS HAVE ALREADY BEEN WRITTEN?
WHAT IF FOLLOWING THAT SCRIPT MEANS THESE SUITS CHALLENGING THE EMERGENCY AS BEYOND
THE PRESIDENT'S FISCAL POWERS WILL DO NOTHING TO ENLARGE CONGRESS' CONTROL OVER THE FEDERAL
PURSE?
WHAT IF INSTEAD IT HAS THE MAIN EFFECT OF GIVING TRUMP AN ELECTORAL BOOST IN 2020?
FOR THERE IS ANOTHER RECENT CASE THAT TRACKS, ISSUE-FOR-ISSUE AND BEAT-FOR-BEAT, THE FILED
AND IMPENDING LITIGATION CHALLENGES TO THE WALL-AND TRUMP WON IT.
LIKE THE WALL, THE TRAVEL BAN FULFILLED A 2016 CAMPAIGN PROMISE.
LIKE THE WALL, THE BAN ON ENTRY BY CITIZENS FROM MUSLIM-MAJORITY NATIONS WAS CHALLENGED
WITHIN DAYS.
THE TRAVEL BAN LITIGATION ENDED IN A 5-4 DECISION IN THE U.S. SUPREME COURT, UPHOLDING THE POLICY
MERE MONTHS BEFORE AMERICANS RETURNED TO THE POLLS IN 2018.
THE PARALLELS BETWEEN THE TRAVEL BAN AND THE WALL CASES ARE TOO PRECISE AND TOO PLURAL
TO BE IGNORED.
EVEN IF YOU THINK THE COURT'S ENDORSEMENT OF THE TRAVEL BAN WRONG-AS I HAVE ARGUED-IT
WOULD BE A GRAVE ERROR TO IGNORE ITS PREDICTIVE QUALITY.
TO BEGIN WITH, BOTH THE TRAVEL BAN AND EMERGENCY FUNDING FOR THE WALL REST ON TRUMP'S RELIANCE
UPON A VERY BROAD DELEGATION IN A FEDERAL STATUTE.
IN BOTH CASES, THAT IS, AN EARLIER CONGRESS VOLUNTARILY HANDED OVER WIDE-RANGING POWER
FOR PRESIDENTS TO RESPOND TO NOVEL CIRCUMSTANCES.
IN BOTH CASES, THE PRESIDENT HAS USED THIS POWER TO DOUBLE DOWN ON HARDENING THE BORDER
IN LIGHT WITH HIS CAMPAIGN RHETORIC.
NOT ONLY IS THE PRESIDENT'S LEGAL THEORY IN THE TWO CASES ALIKE, THE ARGUMENTS AGAINST
THE PRESIDENT'S TWO POLICIES ALSO RUN ALONG PARALLEL TRACKS.
FIRST, IN BOTH CASES THERE ALSO ARE POWERFUL ARGUMENTS THAT CONGRESS DID NOT ANTICIPATE
THE KIND OF POLICY TRUMP HAS PURSUED-A BLUNDERBUSS BORDER CONTROL BEARING DOWN HARDEST ON NON-WHITE
MIGRANTS.
THE STATUTORY DELEGATIONS GIVEN BY CONGRESS IN THE TWO CASES, TO BE SURE, MAY HAVE BEEN
BROADLY WRITTEN.
NEITHER THE IMMIGRATION PROVISION AT ISSUE IN THE TRAVEL BAN CASE NOR THE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
PROVISION IN THE WALL CASE IS A BLANK CHECK: IN BOTH CASES, THERE WERE CONDITIONS THAT
THE PRESIDENT LIKELY FAILED TO SATISFY.
SECOND, IN BOTH CASES THE PRESIDENT'S OWN WORDS ABOUT HIS REASONS FOR DECLARING AN EMERGENCY-HIS
ADMISSION THAT THE DECLARATION WAS A STRATEGIC POLITICAL DECISION AND THUS NOT NECESSARILY
BROUGHT ON BY A REAL EMERGENCY-AND THE DATA RELEASED BY HIS OWN ADMINISTRATION FATALLY
UNDERMINE THE FACTUAL JUSTIFICATIONS FOR EMERGENCY, UNILATERAL ACTION.
UNDER THIS DOCTRINE, THE FACT THAT THE PRESIDENT'S AIM OF CIRCUMVENTING CONGRESS'S CONTROL OF
APPROPRIATIONS IS ARGUABLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL MATTERS NO MORE THAN THE PRESIDENT'S EXPRESSIONS
OF ANIMUS MATTERED IN THE TRAVEL BAN CASE.
MY POINT IS NOT HERE THAT THE SUPREME COURT'S TRAVEL BAN DECISION IS CORRECT.
THE ROBERTS COURT SHOWED ITSELF CAPABLE OF INTENSE SKEPTICISM OF A DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENT'S
IMMIGRATION INITIATIVE WHEN IT ALMOST INVALIDATED PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA'S "DAPA" PROGRAM, WHICH
GRANTED WORK PERMITS AND DEPORTATION STAYS TO THOUSANDS OF NONCITIZEN PARENTS.s
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét