Thứ Tư, 29 tháng 3, 2017

Waching daily Mar 30 2017

What Everyone Should Know About the New Quarantine Regulation

Imagine men in bleach white bio suits with medical masks show up at your door.

You are suspected of carrying a communicable disease.

You will now be arrested and held without due process, indefinitely.

The government could do this any day.

They have the �authority�.

They have the personnel.

They have the funding.

Now all they need is the excuse.

The Authority

The federal government claims the right to quarantine anyone who they suspect has or

has come into contact with a communicable disease.

On January 19th of this year, a regulation was passed by the Centers for Disease Control

(CDC) and Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

The regulation is meant to allow the HHS and other departments of the federal government

to stop the spread of contagious diseases, like Ebola or bird flu.

But the regulation is obscure enough to be a serious threat to liberty.

Because the government does not consider quarantine an arrest, those being detained are not afforded

the same rights and due process that criminals are supposed to get through the U.S. Justice

system.

Apprehension and detention of persons with quarantinable communicable diseases.

(a) The Director may authorize the apprehension, medical examination, quarantine, isolation,

or conditional release of any individual for the purpose of preventing the introduction,

transmission, and spread of quarantinable communicable diseases, as specified by Executive

Order, based upon a finding that:

(1) The individual is reasonably believed to be infected with a quarantinable communicable

disease in a qualifying stage and is moving or about to move from a State into another

State; or

(2) The individual is reasonably believed to be infected with a quarantinable communicable

disease in a qualifying stage and constitutes a probable source of infection to other individuals

who may be moving from a State into another State.

That pretty much covers everyone, in a sly little trick to make this regulation somehow

apply to interstate commerce.

Anyone living in America risks coming into contact with someone who might physically

move into another state.

And a person must simply be �reasonably believed� to be infected or have come into

contact with an infection, which again is a very low standard that could easily apply

to almost anyone who has recently gone out in public.

Even when they define �reasonably believed,� the CDC and HHS use obscure language so that

the definition could basically fit anyone.

Reasonably believed to be infected, as applied to an individual, means specific articulable

facts upon which a public health officer could reasonably draw the inference that an individual

has been exposed, either directly or indirectly, to the infectious agent that causes a quarantinable

communicable disease, as through contact with an infected person or an infected person�s

bodily fluids, a contaminated environment, or through an intermediate host or vector,

and that as a consequence of the exposure, the individual is or may be harboring in the

body the infectious agent of that quarantinable communicable disease.

Indirectly being exposed to a contaminated environment could get you quarantined.

That doesn�t sound like a very strict standard, nor does it sound like a well defined parameter

for apprehension.

Basically anyone could think up a �reasonable� suspicion that someone has been exposed to

a disease that would require quarantine.

The regulation says those quarantined will be allowed representation, but what good will

this representative do?

The government has all the obscure �authority� they need to keep you on lock down.

The regulation also allows the government to conduct screenings �through non-invasive

procedures determined appropriate� at airports, bus stations, and other public places, where

people may be required to provide contact information.

And there is the obscure limit again: �determined appropriate.� It is a safe bet that the

government will determine any action it takes as �appropriate�.

This means people will be compelled to answer the government�s questions and provide information

against their will.

Since carrying a disease is not guilt of a crime, the CDC and HHS believe that this does

not violate the Fifth Amendment protections against being compelled to give testimony

that may incriminate you.

As for how this doesn�t violate the Fourth Amendment against unreasonable search and

seizure, the regulation sites some legal precedents for how the government can legally violate

your rights.

And the same will apply after apprehension where during a forced medical exam, you may

also be required to provide further health details about yourself to the authorities.

The Personnel: Who Will Enforce This?

The group capable of large scale detainment and quarantine was authorized under the Affordable

Care Act (Obamacare).

A thousands strong army of medical police is ready to be activated by the government,

and spring into action in case of an epidemic.

SEC.

5210 ESTABLISHING A READY RESERVE CORPS

Section 203 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 204) is amended to read as follows:

SEC.

203 COMMISSIONED CORPS AND READY RESERVE CORPS

�(a) Establishment-

�(1) IN GENERAL- There shall be in the Service a commissioned Regular Corps and a Ready Reserve

Corps for service in time of national emergency.

�(2) REQUIREMENT- All commissioned officers shall be citizens of the United States and

shall be appointed without regard to the civil-service laws and compensated without regard to the

Classification Act of 1923, as amended.

Notice that officers are appointed �without regard to the civil-service laws.� These

are laws designed to remove politics as a consideration when hiring in the public sector.

They also establish guidelines based on merit, impartial hiring criteria, and safety from

arbitrary firing and unwarranted disciplinary action.

Officers are also chosen �without regard to the Classification Act of 1923,� which

established merit pay and compensation based on performance.

To be clear, the bill states these laws will be disregarded when appointing this police

force.

So these officers have been hired based on no known criteria, without any defined qualifications,

can be denied for no particular reason, can be fired for any reason whatsoever, paid without

regard to merit, and punished or rewarded independently of performance.

That section basically ensures the Ready Reserve Corps can be a politicized group that will

follow orders of whoever appoints them.

The Funding

Most of the provisions discussed are already well funded through the Centers for Disease

Control, and Department of Health and Human Services.

But another source to bolster the government quarantine capabilities is making its way

through congress.

The bill, which has passed the House and is now in the Senate, wants the government to

be able to deal with �surge capacity� in the event of an epidemic.

It would use certain Homeland Security grants and funds for �enhancing medical preparedness,

medical surge capacity, and mass prophylaxis capabilities.�

The Excuse

We�ve heard about some disease every year with the potential to cause mass casualties

in the event of an outbreak.

It is difficult to tell sometimes how much of the hype is media driven, versus which

diseases are of real concern.

But there is actual risk for an eventual epidemic.

In China, a particularly deadly strain of bird flu is more prevalent this year than

in the past four years.

The Spanish Flu epidemic of 1918 which killed tens of millions of people worldwide, is believed

to have started in China in a similar fashion.

All it takes is the right mutation of the flu virus to become deadly.

So in a sense, the government should be prepared for such an event, but that doesn�t mean

they have to violate rights in order to keep the public safe.

It is important to remember that when protecting the public health, the concern is for the

general population and not individuals.

That is why regulations like this one open up the possibility that individuals will be

severely mistreated, in the name of stopping a contagious outbreak.

If the government does implement the forced quarantine of individuals, whether the excuse

is real or fabricated, individuals have cause to fear

for their safety under government detainment.

For more infomation >> What Everyone Should Know About the New Quarantine Regulation - Health - Duration: 9:12.

-------------------------------------------

Triunfo para firmar 'la orden de la autonomía energética' que rueda mañana iniciativas traseras del - Duration: 4:52.

For more infomation >> Triunfo para firmar 'la orden de la autonomía energética' que rueda mañana iniciativas traseras del - Duration: 4:52.

-------------------------------------------

Your Bottled Water is Filled With Fluoride! Learn Which Brands to Avoid - Health - Duration: 4:55.

Your Bottled Water is Filled With Fluoride! Learn Which Brands to Avoid

You may have heard about some of the buzz surrounding fluoride. Its negative effects,

according to research, appear to have become severe. The downsides of fluoride use have

been brought to light and are now being discussed worldwide. Fluoride is found in many public

water products, and may pose some serious health threats. If you�re a bottled water

connoisseur, you�ll want to read on.

Experts have been arguing for years about whether or not fluoride in drinking water

is toxic to humans. Recent studies have finally shown evidence that it is. Extremely high

levels of fluoride have been shown to cause neurotoxicity in adults, resulting in negative

impacts on memory and learning. Researchers from the Harvard School of Public Health and

China Medical University in Shenyang combined 27 studies, finding strong indications that

fluoride also adversely affects cognitive development in children.

A study published in the Journal of Epidemiological & Community Health found that those who consume

fluoridated water are more likely to suffer from thyroid issues, which often result in

depression and obesity.

According to the study, �In many areas of the world, hypothyroidism is a major health

concern and in addition to other factors � such as iodine deficiency�fluoride exposure should

be considered as a contributing factor. The findings of the study raise particular concerns

about the validity of community fluoridation as a safe public health measure.�

In the United States, about 70% of public water supplies are fluoridated. Intake cannot

be controlled, it�s available to everyone regardless of age or health, and it accumulates

in the body. While fluoride is often associated with preventing tooth decay, research has

found no significant relationship between tooth decay and fluoride intake among children.

Many children are instead being overexposed to fluoride, leading to dental fluorosis,

a discoloring of tooth enamel caused by too much fluoride.

The health risks of drinking fluoridated water are numerous. It can have negative impacts

on oral health, interfere with brain functions, cause damage to the pineal gland, affect thyroid

function, damage bone and decrease overall health. Knowing which bottled water brands

to avoid is vital to keeping yourself and your family safe from the damaging affects

of consuming too much fluoride.

High-risk bottled water brands full of fluoride that you�ll want to avoid include:

Arrowhead Belmont Springs

Crystal Rock Crystal Springs

Deer Park Diamond Springs

Ice Mountain Mount Olympus

Ozarka Poland Spring

Sierra Springs Zephyrhills

Some fluoride-safe water bottle companies are listed below. Here�s a complete list.

Arbor Springs Aquafina Water

Aqua Pure Black Berry Farms

Blue Ice Natural Mineral Water Cascade

Century Springs Clear Mountain Spring Water

Crystal Spring Natural Spring Water Dannon

Deja Blue Eureka

Evian Flowing Springs

Fresh Market Glacier Bay

Hidden Valley Natural Mineral Water Mountain Valley Spring Water

Oasis Pure Drinking Water Polaris Water

Smart Water Whole Foods 365

Health Affects of Drinking Bottled Water

While knowing which bottled water brands to avoid is important, bottled water has its

own impact on health and the environment. Around 67 million water bottles are throw

away every single day, causing a staggering amount of waste. Drinking from plastic water

bottles can also pose some serious health risks, including learning and behavioral problems,

altered immune system function, early puberty in girls and fertility problems, decreased

sperm count, prostate cancer, breast cancer, diabetes and obesity. Thanks to BPA, an estrogen-mimicking

chemical found in plastic, your health may be at risk if you�re drinking bottled water

on a regular basis.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét