Waching daily Mar 30 2017

Good afternoon.

Today, we will analyze the 1995's 66th Kisei-sen match,

Between Murayama Satoshi 8th Dan and Moriuchi Toshiyuki 8th Dan.

Murayama 8th Dan is Sente. He started with 76Fu.

And the Gote, Moriuchi 8th Dan reacted with 34Fu.

26Fu, he blocked Kaku's path...

Advanced the edge Fu. Is it the Fujī System?

It was in 1995, I think, in this year, Fujī System was highly used.

Swinged to Shikenbisha.

77Kaku.

He is going to play it slowly.

84Fu at this position? It is an uncommon move.

What is his idea? I can be a support, when the Keima jumps up.

End he can use it to make the Gin Kanmuri defense.

It is hard to think he would goes up with Gin like this, but it is a possibility.

84Fu...?

62Gyoku, more than an attack, this 84Fu looks like a preparation for Gin Kanmuri.

Looks like he will fight letting the opponent defend. He didn't use Fujī System.

The master Moriuchi, just like on Fukaura x Moriuchi match,

he can gain a complete victory playing his Shikenbisha.

Looks like he doesn't care to face a complete Anaguma.

<i>Ibisha Anaguma</i>

Even though, he continues to build Anaguma.

Ah, 65Fu at this point? It is an aggressive move.

Well, if he doesn't play it now, the Kaku could goes back, and Gin goes back, too.

Well, he tried to take the positioning advantage at this point.

Takes with Gin, and with Keima, the Gin is dead, but he defended it with 66Fu.

It is a Gin for Keima exchange, but it is defense's Keima for attack's Gin,

and in addition, he earned a Fu, so, it is not that bad for Sente.

45Fu, he doesn't take it immediately, this is the professional move.

And the answer is 55Fu, does he take it now?

No, he don't. Looks like he will fight without take this Gin.

He won't take, or he will let it be until the limit. 46Fu, DōFu, 52Gin.

Interesting, with this, the Gin is out of position. It doesn't defend this side.

So, 24Fu, and defended it with Hisha.

Is Tarasu (put Fu) here too slow? What would be good here?

If he takes here, and reacts with DōFu, he could put 64Kei and it weakens the defense.

26Hisha, 64Fu.

With this 64Fu, defense was restructured.

Then, 25Fu. Interesting, if he takes with Hisha, he plays 46Hisha attacking this Gin.

How could answer this move? It is hard to take this Fu, but...

Maybe, he didn't have other choice. Ah, 16Hisha. He ran to the edge.

Then, 14Fu. With this, Hisha became pressed.

65Fu. 65Fu... If he wants to open Hisha's path, he could play 45Fu.

But if he plays it, would play 24Kaku, aiming to promote at 57.

It wouldn't be good for Sente.

65Fu is an aggressive move.

At this point, he plays 96Fu. Put this move now?!

The idea of this 65Fu is, if he takes with DōFu...

What could he do?

Would it be Gin attacking 34Gin?

45Gin is bad, because, it could answer with 85Kei, 86Kaku, 35Fu, and Hisha would die, so 45Fu would be better. Would it be Gin attacking 34Gin?

45Gin is bad, because, it could answer with 85Kei, 86Kaku, 35Fu, and Hisha would die, so 45Fu would be better.

With this, 15Fu, 36Hisha, 35Fu, and this move erases the 36Hisha. So Hisha runs here. 45Gin is bad, because, it could answer with 85Kei, 86Kaku, 35Fu, and Hisha would die, so 45Fu would be better.

With this, 15Fu, 36Hisha, 35Fu, and this move erases the 36Hisha. So Hisha runs here.

65Fu, DōFu. He opened Kaku's path. Well, he can play 64Fu.

After 65Fu, DōFu.

If he takes with DōKei, probably he would 68Kaku, defend the 57 and attacks Keima.

At this point, he could play 24Kaku.

And after he shows the 15Fu followed by 35Fu.

Even in this position, playing 66Fu, 15Fu, 36Hisha, 35Fu, Hisha would die, but with 45Fu,

36Fu, and could restore taking the Kaku with 26Kaku, so it is not that bad.

To lose a Keima is a little heavy.

That's why he ignore the 65Fu.

And put some spice here with 96Fu. DōFu.

And then, 24Kaku. Then, 64Fu.

DōKin. He is taking the path I told before.

Well, if goes ahead, and ahead here, now, he can goes ahead this other one.

68Kaku, 85Kei. He suddenly jumped up.

It is not like master Moriuchi's move. It looks like a careless attack.

54Fu, DōFu, after this Hisha.

32Hisha, and 45Fu.

Exchange it and take with DōKin Agaru (goes up).

If he takes the Keima.

Puts the Fu.

DōKyō, DōKei Nari, DōGin.

He gave up many Fu.

93Kyō Uti (Put), defend with Keima.

Takes the Keima.

This is a position where I want to push the 85Fu.

95Kyō, DōFu.

85Fu.

Then, put Fu.

Ah, DōKin. He cleaned up the pieces.

Oh, 83Fu? 83fu...

Put the Fu... DōGin.

He cames sacrificing the pieces...

But with this, I'm not sure if we can call his defense Anaguma, anymore.

At this position, at any moment, he could take a 98Fu.

Put here, DōGin.

And put the Kyōsha.

It is... If takes the 76, he could take the Kin at 71.

The own Gyoku still is safe.

So, for 66Kyō, he could only play 55Kaku.

With this, if he takes the Kin, Kaku would takes the Gyoku.

Then, 46 Kaku.

Humm, Interesting... If plays DōUma, would it be DōHisha?

With this, he eliminated the Uma and now is aiming to take Kin, or promote 43Fu Nari.

At this point, the answer can be 55Kaku. In this case, he would promote the Fu.

Or else, he could ran the Hisha... But what would happen if he promote the Fu?

If he take Hisha, I would have doubt which I would take. Would I take Kin?

Takes the Kin, then 55Kaku? What more could happen?

This is a sequence hard to read until the end, too.

To attack this defense, would give many pieces, aid it would become dangerous.

I don't know if this sequence is an advantage for Sente.

Well, there is the possibility of Hisha to ran away, too.

That's why it is not easy to take this 46Kaku.

64Fu. Is a move with patience.

Then, 55Kaku. With this, Sente's Gyoku is very safe, so he can attack.

Put Kin.

96Fu.

Well, he put 96Fu. Instead of 96Fu, he could defend putting 62Gin.

If he puts Gin...

Would it be 54Fu? With this, it would be DōGin, 64Kin.

Attacks Gin. Other interesting sequence would be 84Fu, DōGin, 74Kin.

As there is no Fu on 8th column, this sequence draw attention.

In this match he played 96Fu. He gone to attack.

The answer for 96Fu was Ōte.

Gyoku draws back, and he followed with Ōte.

Then, he took the Gin.

84Gin this was a move full of hope.

Interesting. If take this Gin here, DōKei, this Keima would support the attack.

That's why, instead of take it, he put the Gin. It is a professional move.

94Fu, an attack defense very good to watch.

If takes the Kaku, 93 is check mate.

Defend with 81Kei. This move is incredible!

Teki no Utitai Tokoro he Ute Put a piece where opponent wants to put. Defend with 81Kei. This move is incredible!

Teki no Utitai Tokoro he Ute Put a piece where opponent wants to put.

He lessened the pressure here, with 64Kaku Nari. Was it hard to continue?

Well, if take Keima, he loses his Kaku?

Could take Kyōsha and promote Fu, but it wouldn't be a threat of mate,

Then could take this Gin, and it would be dangerous.

That's why he played 64Kaku Nari. I also support the defense a little.

Finally he took the Gin. With this Keima shows up to attack.

DōKei and 72Kei. 72Kei?

It is a position where I never saw a Keima being used before.

He is pretty calm and ran his Uma. To take the Keima at this moment...

If takes Keima now, he would take the Uma.

82Gin, mate in one with 91Gin Nari, but with 94Gin, it is hard to find next attack.

Well, as he used his Keima here, this side is much more safe.

That's why he drew back 55Kaku quietly. This position is not good for Gote.

Then, he hang up with 64Fu. Takes the Keima.

DōGyoku. Kyōsha ran.

Takes, take and put Gin.

With this, he did a simple Ōte Bisha. (check x Hisha fork)

Well, he could play 95Keima.

But maybe it wouldn't be good. And to give a Keima can be dangerous.

In this match he played 54Uma.

82Gyoku, 65Kei.

94Kyō, 98Fu.

Take the Keima with Kyōsha, DōFu, 86Kei.

Then, takes Gin.

Put it once again, then he flee.

Put Kyōsha. He is trying to finish it.

Well, he reacted to the 96Kyō with Fu.

Then, instead of take the Hisha, of course he came to this side. A professional move.

Shuuban ha Sontoku Yori Sokudo. Late game, speed over earning pieces. Then, instead of take the Hisha, of course he came to this side. A professional move.

Shuuban ha Sontoku Yori Sokudo. Late game, speed over earning pieces.

Played this, and this... But as it is not threat of mate,

let's see how much Gote can attack.

Ah, he defended. Will he defend here?

That's right, if he gives a Keima, his Gyoku can be taken.

Takes Kin, DōKin, and put Keima. With this it is a mate thereat,

but as gave a Keima, takes Gin, DōGyoku, 75Kei.

As he have 3 Gin, the game is over. Interesting!

So, he can't give a Keima.

His guts to play 71Kyō at this moment is impressive!

Then, 63Kin. He still can't give the Keima.

Then, 81Kyō. He has many guts.

96Fu?

Hashi Gyoku niha HashiFu. For Gyoku in the edge, use Fu in the edge.

Interesting. He played 96Fu. Hashi Gyoku niha HashiFu. For Gyoku in the edge, use Fu in the edge.

Hashi Gyoku niha HashiFu. For Gyoku in the edge, use Fu in the edge.

After, when he plays 94Gyoku, to take the Gin is Ōte. Hashi Gyoku niha HashiFu. For Gyoku in the edge, use Fu in the edge.

After, when he plays 94Gyoku, to take the Gin is Ōte.

In this match for this 94Fu,

he took the Kin. I think he thought that he couldn't defend any more.

Then, he took the Gin, then, DōGyoku.

After DōGyoku, he returned and played 78Kin. Then, this game will not end too fast?

Well, he took the Keima.

Then, 86Kei. And he did Ōte with Keima.

Then, he gone down. He drew back, but what would happen if he had taken it with Fu?

For this DōFu...

Would it be Gin here?

For this Gin, if he goes back, as he can't use a Fu, with only 2 Gin it would be hard.

Then... Would it be 94Gin?

If it was 94Gin, DōGyoku, 95Fu. Let's move it to see how it is.

Well, dodge, put Gin. This Gin looks make it easier, so, let's take here.

Let's see...

How is it? Even if he make Ōte, as he don't have Kyōsha... Would goes back? Is it better?

Following with Ōte... Puts Gin, too...

In this position, there is no mate.

But he can take Keima, with this Sente's Gyoku become safe. Then, puts DōFu.

Well, with DōFu, the Kyōsha begin to work, it is aiming to the Sente's Gyoku.

Well, there is no mate, but is there a winning sequence? It's good to block Kyōsha.

There is still the Ōte Bisha. But to take Hisha at this point...

He could block it with some piece at 74, like this.

It wouldn't be good to be happy with this Ōte Bisha.

That's why...

There is the sequence with 82Fu.

With 83Fu it is a mate thereat with 84Kei. 82Fu is a mate threat with 84Kei, too.

Well, with Kyōsha's path blocked, it is hard to attack here.

Then, DōKyō.

Let's see, what we could do? We could sacrifice the Uma.

Well, if do it, there would be the 55Kaku, an attack/defense move, it would be hard.

Well, sacrifice, DōGyoku, put the Kyōsha, can't use Fu, then goes back Gyoku.

At this point, some mate threat...

Which one is most certain?

At any moment there is the 55Kaku.

Well, could put Keima. Put Keima, goes up, takes.

Here is DoGyoku. Put the Kyōsha. Can't use Fu, so defend with 72Kei.

At this point, would be 83Gin, promoting or not.

The doubt is how is it? Even if put Fu, could DōGyoku or flee.

Well, I think there is no mate. Could take this Kin with 45Kaku.

Puts Keima, takes, 45Kaku. To lose this Kin would be bad.

For the Fu would be DōGyoku.

For the 55Kaku, would be 66Fu.

Something like this. The other side is hard to defend.

With this, Sente looks good. I think Sente would win.

Let's see if I can move everything back.

Like this, Like this, and the Kyōsha here...

Were we in the 75Kei position, right?

Before put Fu. And the Fu...

The Keima was here...

And the Kyōsha was there, too.

Was it like this?!

Let's see...

At 75Kei, in this game he retreated.

Well, at this position, could attack with 94Gin. 94Gin...

If it is 75Kei, 93Gyoku, 94Gin, maybe it would be better to play 94Gin before.

This is... How would... If it is DōGyoku...

With 95Fu, looks like it is over.

Let's see...

Is to draw back like this hard?

If is not easy but looks like it is over.

How would?

Would it be 94Gin, goes up, put Gin?

If DōKyō, DōUma it is an easy mate. That's why, goes up, and would it be 87Kei?

Then, takes... What would I use at this time?

Would be Fu? If puts Gin then he would goes back... Puts Gin...

Well, re goes back and then, put 82Gin.

In this case there is a mate.

IF DōKyō, take, goes up... 73Uma.

Take, take... As still have 2 Kyōsha, still there is a chance...

You can put it and check mate it.

Well, in this match he played 75Kei. (sorry)

I think he 94Gin would finish it.

But in this match he took 75Kei.

Drew back, put Gin.

DōKyō, takes, takes...

Put 94Gin, and Moriuchi 8th Dan resigned the match with Murayama's Victory.

For this 94Gin, if DōGyoku, 95Fu.

Well, if DōGyoku, could put 96Fu. If flee, he would attack putting Gin.

The rest, you only have to make many Ōte until check-mate.

For 94Gin, could goes up to 84, then followed by 73Gin.

And the sequence would reach mate with one Ōte after another.

In the end, it became a little... one doubt is how it would be if 75Kei, DōFu.

In general... In the Joban (Beginning) 65Fu, DōGin, 73Kei.

Had the aggressive game of master Moriuchi, but in the end he didn't take the Gin.

The sequence of master Murayama, going back 68Kaku, avoiding to lose his Hisha was good.

He attacked from the edge...

But to have to attack from the edge at that time, don't show a good Furibisha game.

Well, Sente had the game in his hand all game and the advantage grew slowly.

In the end, the edge attack and the defense with 2 Kyōsha in a row was extraordinary.

But Sente maintained his advantage.

Thank you very much.

For more infomation >> (002)Murayaka Satoshi X Moriuchi Toshiyuki (Shikenbisha X Ibisha Anaguma) - Duration: 38:21.

-------------------------------------------

Conferencia de Gerard Passola: "Riesgo en el arbolado urbano" - Duration: 16:17.

I'm going to talk about risk and I'm going to make a little introduction related to the main topic discussed today, which is the benefit of trees.

We need to keep in mind that risk analysis' are done to save trees,

they are a discipline that seeks to understand why trees fall and also to distinguish between a dangerous tree and one that is not.

The first consequence of a well-conducted risk analysis is that fewer trees are cut.

If we are unaware of the meaning of a tree as a heritage and benefit,

it is very easy to fall into the temptation of: "you know what? Let's cut it down a bit, "" you know what? Let's cut the top "

If we do not think of the beneficial factor of the tree is very difficult to put it on the the risk balance,

because this always frightens us, with that feeling of "what if… this, or what if ... that"

If we do not think of the tree as an unquestionable benefit, we will be bad risk assessors.

Note that a man who is a risk assessor cans see in a year 3000 trees

and after ten years would have seen 30,000 trees and still he can make mistakes.

You can assure that a tree is safe and then it falls on someone and kills them,

and that is a responsibility that not everybody want to assume.

The risk analysis is not to be on the safe side,

and everything I see that I do not like, is out

That's not risk, that's something else.

In risk analysis you have to be serious and honest with reality

and if one is not, will be then the risk analysis the ones that have the risk,

sorry for the redundancy, to go over the top

If we understand that a tree is a tool that can improve people's happiness,

the decisions will be calmer

If we simply see the trees as an inheritance

and that "they are beautiful and have always been there" ...

No, listen, the trees are not that, they are a tool to improve people's happiness in the city

so beware of decisions that we make

This has to conunteract constantly the decision-making progress as we the see proportionality in the decisions we make

If we do not have that counterweight, the balance is always on the other side.

This is the city we want, which we understand to be beneficial to people,

where the population goes in the streets out and relieves stress.

This means that the decisions concerning those trees have to take into account the existential benefit,

and I cannot remove them just because it is what I think is best.

Small trees in small streets

I think people here are happy,

maybe they can't pass with the cart, or the leaves fall in the drainage channel

But I'm telling you, people outside this place are happy

and here not as much

I defend a kind of extreme arboriculture

that seeks to look not only the technical and feasible part,

also the part of social consideration that it implies.

These are a series of photographs for you can see the visual effect

that can cause the presence or absence of trees

When I decide to cut a tree, it is a risk decision,

but I am affecting that capacity to relieve stress

and to operate with greater happiness of the people,

and that is a decision that is not included in the job of a technician

Notice that in the current measurements, tree units are not the only things that matters,

whether you have ten thousand or a hundred thousand.

Final coverage is what matters

How many trees do I have per inhabitant?

No, how many square meters or cubic meters of leaves do you have?

That's the data.

That means introducing pruning and having trees with a different risk factor

Obviously the telephone pole does not fall,

but the telephone pole does not give any benefit either

It is not that the tree generates happiness, but it does facilitate that happiness

It is landscape, it is so many things ...

You have to quantify the benefit of the tree,

but I do not care if it's 2,200 or 2,500 dollars;

one has to understand that there is an average value per tree

and that when you make a risk decision you do it whether or not you know the concrete data of how much C02 it produces

It is a general average value that one has to recognize and with that you can get by

It is informative and important to have it,

but in the end it is not so much important how much you or you are worth

You are worthy because you are a person, and that's it

Thes are very interesting photograps from an English researcher

so that you can see the depopulation that generates the loss of trees in the enviroment

A Dutch scientist says that trees generate metabolites

that you breathe and favor the segregation of endorphins,

but the tree in the picture is not generating any metabolites

It is the visual perception that we have

and how the landscape changes and with it also our comfort on it landscape

Notice that in this case only two trees are cut;

we can understand that it is London

This can be a neighborhood of Warsaw.

This is London too

When we mediate we are changing the benefit that the tree generates,

so we shouldn't take the risk carelessly,

because the tree has a huge importance

Before, I said that it is not worth knowing value of each tree and in general I think so,

but it is necessary for each town hall to make the effort in each town hall to put big numbers to the things

If I know that my trees have a health value, and a C02 value,

even if they are large numbers, I can compare

For example, how many complaints do I have on raised sidewalks or other issues?

Let's put the numbers on the table and see what's bigger.

It is more difficult and more intangible in the question of urban trees,

but you have to do that exercise and see what is greater

The most important thing in the town hall to make a change is to get a central core,

to have a group of people very convinced of that,

because if you are only as a technician you are surpassed

You need to talk to the mayor so that they understand that this should be a priority for the city council

When that happens in any project, it comes to a good end

If a government team is determined on, I don't know, make a football stadium,

they will do it

You need to bring people together, teach them, train them and get them to listen to good people,

and things will move forward

As a technician you have two benchmarks: zero risks, zero problems.

The tree can not be in the drainage channel, but a meter from it.

A clear list of inconveniences should be made.

I remember a lady who was told by a friend of a pruner, who called the town hall again and again to prune the trees.

The story is that the woman sewed up and needed more natural light, and wanted all the pruned trees

What is a inconvenience?

In New York City you can ask the city council to go to your house to show up because there is a problem,

but the list of annoyance is set by them, not you.

For example, annoyance #1, the tree covers a traffic light, etc.

There is a list of annoyances that the city council sets,

and if your annoyance is not among them ,you cannot send the pruning form

Calling?...

No, look, fill out the form on the Internet and send it to me,

and if it's not a real problem, we will have to ignore it,

because that's not a real annoyance, it's a fictitious inconvenience

In general, trees endure much more than we think.

When a tree falls it will be in the news, because it rarely happens

And there are many works in the streets, many sidewalks cuts, etc.

Let's say that trees have a capacity to withstand mistreatment

There is one thing that's very interesting to me

In London, there is a working team, the Tree Commission, which designs the urban trees

People who meet only when decisions about trees are to be made.

There are real estate developers, freeway workers, owners of the Telecoms ...

There are all the people involved in the urban space shared with the tree.

There is also the entire town hall, because they all have to understand the good of the trees

When the bussines man who decides to put electric utilities or gas pipes understands the value,

it is easy for him to take measures or talk with the colleague of parks and gardens to solve the problemas that may come up...

When people in all sectors have understood that, it is easier to take action

In the United States especially, but also in other cities, they are working on joint management of rainwater and trees

The cities are no longer designed, in the part of iplanting trees, without taking into account the water inflitration

The same tree surround is used to be a point of accumulation of water to reduce the runoff,

to reduce the section of the pipes mananing rainwater, reduce the section of purifier, etc

The idea is that the city is permeable, but that does not mean that all pavements are

It means that each tree element may have a small water input capacity

In Barcelona, we are trying to make a system of percolation of water in each tree surround

Everything that falls from rain goes to the tree.

There are deposits are not connected, or may not be connected

They fill up and then through permeability the water reaches the ground and that's it,

and then when it's full it goes to the next and so on

More than what kind of pavement, you have to wonder how I don't let the rainwater to slip and get into my city

We must make entry points associated with accumulation capacity

But what I'm saying, you have to notice that sometimes the risk decisions we make pay for the sins of others.

In my town there was a great storm and 125,000 trees fell down between forest and private properties

The city council let people cut whatever they wanted the following month

All the trees who had been saved, those who had proved themselves to be good,

were eliminated because of that panic

That decision taken because of the panic among people, which I understand,

is sometimes not the real from the point of view of risk associated with a particular tree

We have to manage the sensations of the people, since we work for them,

but we also have to be honest with the reality of the risk that we manage,

and not let ourselves be fouled by that panic

We have to be a bit brave

I remember in 1995, when I started, a congress in Madrid that was about the inherited tree

30 years later we are still talking about the inherited tree, which has touched us and we have not been able to decide.

The town councils are still there. It is about time, enough is enough: You must make the decision to cut

If we wait until the tree dies to change the city we will not change anything

If we want to improve the quality of the city through the trees we have to take the chainsaw,

and finish with the old, the sick, etc

That means scheduling and explaining very well why, but we have to be brave

It is necessary to preserve the singular and the emblematic, evidently, and protect it

But often the most dangerous trees in the city are also the ugliest and most expensive

Well, we can start there ...

To start changing the tree it is no excuse

For more infomation >> Conferencia de Gerard Passola: "Riesgo en el arbolado urbano" - Duration: 16:17.

-------------------------------------------

3 Rejet caractéristique du Christ - Duration: 2:56.

For more infomation >> 3 Rejet caractéristique du Christ - Duration: 2:56.

-------------------------------------------

3 Rechazo características de Cristo - Duration: 6:16.

For more infomation >> 3 Rechazo características de Cristo - Duration: 6:16.

-------------------------------------------

Conferencia de José Antonio Corraliza: "El árbol y el bienestar humano" - Duration: 19:08.

Some of you may ask what does a psychologist here,

dedicated to environmental psychology

Fundamentally, what we are trying to tackle is a question raised from the origins of psychology

which is how influence the medium and the environment in which people live in their levels of well-being

At the time it had very vivid names, for example it was called geo-psyche

It tried to study how the landscapes influence in the states of mind,

in the characters of the people and their emotional states

And this is what took me, a long time ago,

, to raise my doctoral thesis on these things and then devote myself to research on this topic

What I want to say here is that the city and the urban environments ...,

and when we talk about city we should not only think about prototypical examples (New York, México DF, París, Barcelona, Madrid)

In Spain all can be considered city, with rigor any urban nucleus of more than 2000 inhabitants

Although there are small nucleus, even the most hidden corner ends up adopting spatial patterns and lifestyles typical of cities

Let's take a tour through the tree, how it is perceived,

but thinking of a concept that I call 'near nature'

The tree is the most important stimulus-signal that brings us closer to a type of stimulation

has been crucial for our survival as a species, which is vegetation

This drawing of a child represented life in Madrid

Apart from seeing how important TV is,

of the few buildings there are two or three that have TVs' logos,

what we see is that he has a impression of the city empty.

There are very few people represented, just this basketball court

that looks more like props than active players

This is the image we sometimes have of urban spaces.

The question is: Has our nervous system adapted to living and working in this type of environment?

And well, you can notice that there is no vegetation represented

The most important theses related to this topic I will argue from here

The first is that the urban green space is not an ornament,

it is a necessity

It is not a mere ornament, we are not talking about how to beautify or make a street more attractive

Another point is that the green areas and all the elements that compose it

are crucial to establish what we can call a habitability standard of space

In the child example we saw before, who would like to live in such a city?

A comfortable habitability is basic to establishing fluid relationships between people and their environments

Relationships that are important

Psychologists say one thing: "We are the places we inhabit"

What would a person inhabit such a city?

Because we are part of the places we inhabit

Another idea is that urban nature is connected to health, in the broadest sense of the WHO

of psychic, physical, emotional and social well-being.

It is true

At present, some doctors are prescribing stays in natural spaces for people affected by different pathologies

We are also at a time when vegetation was part of what was called the rhetoric of the quality of life,

which can be seen even in the advertisements of real estate,

when they are announcing a flat in a green development.

Then you come to the urbanization and have two tree well and three flowerpots

But at first they sell a lot of ecomarketing

The idea is that there is a lot of vegetation and we are in a stage where we have to debate about the quality and the typology of the vegetation

In a recent study we have done on urban squares in Madrid

all had vegetation but of different quality,

and this strongly influences how people evaluate the perceived environmental quality of their surroundings

There is risk in urban green areas, of course

But lately there is an obsessive concern for the safety linked to the trees

I think we have to consider it from another point of view,

because it is not an isolated tree, but a scenic structure,

which is how psychologists call the landscape that makes up the tree

The idea of urban green is not a fashion, it is a necessity of the functioning of our nervous system

Our species, Homo sapiens, has developed its powerful adaptive capacity to the environment

because it has lived in stimulated environments linked to nature

These are well known in the scientific literature as biophilia

we like those environments that have been crucial to our survival

If I put a picture of a sub-desert of Almeria and an Atlantic forest,

everyone will like the Atlantic forest more a priori

because there are many more signs of life

The biophilia hypothesis has two derivatives

As a consequence of how important vegetation and water have been to our survival,

we generate a kind of response that we call cytophilia,

a generalized preference for landscapes with vegetation above any other,

and hydrophilia, a generalized preference for landscape with water.

This indicates that both vegetation and water have been determinant for our survival

Although we do not know the names of the trees or the way of treating them,

we do seek to be in contact with these types of stimulation structures

It is not so much an ornament as a psychological necessity

In front of this we have new forms of habitability that make it difficult

Urban green is not only related to the dynamic ecosystem of the city,

but also to the development of activities that we will see below, to generate images like this,

where green is probably the easiest emotional way to start interacting with urban spaces

An article by Marie-Line Felonneau, a researcher at the University of Lyon, coined the urbanistic-urbanophobic dialer

She made a very complex study that we simplified here

This author asked a group of people what features were prototypically defining an urban environment and a non-urban environment

She called them city items and non-city items

Characteristics of the city is the great amount of culture, more possibilities of work,

social exchange, fashion, going out and evasion, availability of consumer goods, fashion and a certain cosmopolitanism.

Typical items of the non-city were the greenery, the cleanliness, the tranquility,

, the calm, the lack of pollution, the absence of traffic, the security, the kindness, etc

And then asked with this scale to urbanites which characteristics had the ideal environment,

and came out these means that we see here

If we compare them we reach a conclusion:

the characteristics of an ideal environment are those aspects that the city has of no city

What we like most about the city (do you see the means that are much higher?)

are all the characteristics that the city has of spaces that are not characteristically urban

What we like most about the city is what it has of no city, worth the play of words

All this is linked to cleanliness, green, calm, absence of pollution, etc

This is very important because it coined that natural and naturalized spaces act as environments that restore the psychological balance of people

people and are a fundamental resource for stress

It is not a contingent relationship, it comes from a long time before,

where the tree is the great stimulus that conforms landscaping structures

Landscape structures influence people by their psychophysical properties

that regulate the intensity of stimulation

Consider for example how important in summer is a shade of a tree, not only the shade of the Kio Towers in Madrid, but a tree

Also the ecological properties, the fact that they form structural contents of the scene,

and collative properties, which describe the emotional relationship between the person and the landscape

The trees are part of the resources we have

What functions do green spaces fulfill?

The first function is that they are scenic structures for contemplation,

but it is that to contemplate is very important, the contemplative activity

When I went through the Olmos Park here in Sax this morning,

it is more than a place to do things,

it is a contemplative structure where you see living beings

. The emotional relationship with these living beings is very important

and is the result of a first contemplative activity that produces a certain fascination based on three elements:

pleasure, excitement and relaxation that produces a landscape

In addition to scenarios of contemplation, the urban green spaces are scenarios for uses, to be

They are also meeting places

One of the most attractive things about urban space designs (squares, parks and gardens) is that they are populated

The dream of a mayor who seeks money for an architect or a designer of urban spaces to build

is that it is full of people and he is right,

because the most important cancer in a green space is that people do not use it,

because there begins to produce a progressive degeneration of it,

so we must promote the colonization of such spaces

Another function is to be place of walk

The walk is a very important psychological experience because it allows you involuntary attention:

now you listen at the song of a bird, now you see the form of a cloud, now the tree, now you listen the murmur of water

That kind of experience, of involuntary attention in which you suddenly let yourself be impressed by what there is,

is the experience of restoring psychological equilibrium;

the other is an effort that we make, that tires

And the idea of the walk, which Walter Benjamin also related to the infinite desires of drift that we sometimes have,

is fundamental to this

It is also a scenario of game and sport, organized activities

This is where the concept of psychological recovery arises

Urban environments are aggressive environments that produce what we generally call urban stress

(pollution, visual impairment, overcrowding, high density, noise, poverty)

I do not want to be very professorial,

but there is evidence to show how all this experience of unfavorable environmental conditions produces symptoms

such as increased chronic stress, anxiety disorders or increased risk of vascular and coronary diseases

The urban green establishes a set of physical and psychological resources

that help to realize restorative activities,

like the walk, the sport, the meditation

And the sit-ability, the quality that has a space that is interesting for the mere fact that a person sits to see what happens

Think of a large park, just watching people go is entertaining

The idea of recovery of the psychological balance arises from this good man, whom many will know, Frederick Law Olmsted

who, among other things, is the creator of Central Park in New York

When he tries to convince the port authority

that, in addition to large buildings and skyscrapers

look for this rectangular space that forms a crucial part of the identity of New York City, writes:

"Natural environments allow the mind to use without fatigue and so exercise

It reassures it and makes it revive,

and thus, through the influence of the mind on the body,

it achieves the effect of a refreshing reinvigoration and recovery of the total system of the organism"

Not only do they require buildings, but also spaces for psychological recovery

I was very impressed by an article by an American pediatric team that I read in 2010

and which began with a lapidary sentence talking about children in developed countries,

we are not talking about Ghana or Nigeria or countries of very low socioeconomic development,

or high level of spoliation, as we want, because it seems that both variables are very associated.

The thesis of McCurdy and his team said that we are in a situation where it is possible today

that the children who are born now have a lower life expectancy than their parents

This is unusual, except for dramatic events such as war or epidemic,

most of the time we live with the idea that children will have a life expectancy higher than that of their parents

From here we can see that this is linked to a lifestyle with four major health threats

First, the increase, epidemiologically significant in recent years, of the incidence of pneumonic and respiratory diseases,

such as increased infant asthma, linked to pollution and lack of physical exercise

On the other hand, the increase in obesity rates, which are very dangerous for health

Third, the increase in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, closely linked to the fact that children spend many hours indoors

Another indicator is vitamin D deficiency,

related to the lack of sun exposure, which is the great vitamin d nutrient

This led us to give a new meaning to a term already coined, disorder by nature deficit

It is not a pathology that we can give a pill to cure it

It is closely linked to a children's lifestyle that is conformed with children

with busy schedules, with many activities of interior, with much sedentariness, with much click button, etc

These four major problems of pediatric health

are related to this lifestyle, and are precisely the indicators of this syndrome due to nature deficit

For more infomation >> Conferencia de José Antonio Corraliza: "El árbol y el bienestar humano" - Duration: 19:08.

-------------------------------------------

3 Malakcepto (Karakterizaĵoj de Kristo) - Duration: 6:15.

For more infomation >> 3 Malakcepto (Karakterizaĵoj de Kristo) - Duration: 6:15.

-------------------------------------------

Dronevideo: Stroet 50 a Sint Maarten - Duration: 6:19.

For more infomation >> Dronevideo: Stroet 50 a Sint Maarten - Duration: 6:19.

-------------------------------------------

Jogos de Carros para Crianças | Corrida Louca | Desenhos Animados - Duration: 12:16.

For more infomation >> Jogos de Carros para Crianças | Corrida Louca | Desenhos Animados - Duration: 12:16.

-------------------------------------------

3 Respingerea (Caracteristicile lui Hristos) - Duration: 6:16.

For more infomation >> 3 Respingerea (Caracteristicile lui Hristos) - Duration: 6:16.

-------------------------------------------

J'ai perdu mes onglets Firefox 2 solutions #AlloOrdi - Duration: 4:05.

For more infomation >> J'ai perdu mes onglets Firefox 2 solutions #AlloOrdi - Duration: 4:05.

-------------------------------------------

Broken News TV, de opblæste nyheder - Damestenen - Duration: 2:12.

For more infomation >> Broken News TV, de opblæste nyheder - Damestenen - Duration: 2:12.

-------------------------------------------

Birds for kids - Learn animals names | Singing birds and their pictures - Duration: 13:12.

Birds for kids - Learn animals names

For more infomation >> Birds for kids - Learn animals names | Singing birds and their pictures - Duration: 13:12.

-------------------------------------------

Conferencia Susana Domínguez: 'Planes de gestión de arbolado urbano en municipios" - Duration: 17:36.

My work has always been focused on trees,

I love them and I work with them,

and I always try in any work and environmental study to put them in value.

Lately we are working more with urban trees,

because we really see that the tree is the element

the living being that is close to the citizen,

and in cities the problem is often that this connection with the living being is missing.

My talk goes in that line, to give some tools and strategies to be able to manage the urban tree better,

while making the citizen involve of these tools

At economic level, look for an economic valuation of the trees.

If we could get a variable that quantifies the happiness of people with the trees would be ideal

but that is quite difficult.

There are ways of being able to value those variables so interesting that the trees brings us.

There is a part that is sometimes forgotten, as a study in 245 cities shows.

They are the suspended particles that are found in the atmosphere of cities.

Suspended particles are capable of killing many people, they enter the lungs and produce respiratory diseases of all kinds.

There are estimates that in 30 years more than 6 million people can die from air pollution annually.

It has been shown that near the trees the concentration of these particles in suspension decreases.

They are concrete things therefore, not only of happiness that is very important,

but also we speak of tangible things: the presence of urban trees can solve respiratory and pulmonary problems of many citizens

It is everybody's responsibility.

Ninety percent of the world's population living in cities is exposed to particles that exceed WHO guidelines

In Madrid, the suspended particles and pollutants are almost always above

the recommendations of the World Health Organization,

and we just don't care about it. It is something that draws attention.

And the funny thing is that despite all this, we lose trees,

there are fewer trees in the cities, that is quantified.

If we go to any city we knew, in the typical main square we will see.

This is a square in Valladolid, but we could set an example in any other city.

Formerly, 40 or 50 years ago, the main square was full of trees

but now has nothing to do, have no trees and is another landscape.

We can talk about a photo that appeared on Facebook of Seville

a pedestrianized street that has completely changed its form, approach and landscape.

Up, a leafy street, and down, a street full of buildings that looks like another,

with four orange trees that seem to be part of the urban furniture

Like an orange tree, they could have put a bench or a street lamp.

There it is not seen that there is an interpretation of the health benefits

and of all type that the urban tree offers, here it really seems a mere decoration

When we have that clear, what can we do?

We have to change our city format

How do we do it?

Because many times we do not know how to work and communicate those values of the trees

It is important to keep in mind that we have to reach out to the citizen to be educated and aware of those values,

he has to realize that these advantages exist, and he has to make them his own.

There is a lot of research that shows that the urban tree is favorable for the human being:

it reduces pollution, improves the quality of life, many things ...

For example, the effect on temperature, which is patent

Here is an example of a test that was done in Mexico,

on a street with and without trees with the same air temperature, 33 degrees.

That car without trees and without any type of cover reaches to register 70 degrees

whereas the same car under a vegetal cover registers 33'6 degrees

We are talking about patents things that we have all seen and experienced in our lives

They are refrigeration factories that we do not take advantage of,

and anyone who explains it understands it perfectly.

We are creating climate change with our cities, which generates impressive islands of heat.

Study what we have in our cities,

see how we can manage what we have

and a third leg that would be to disseminate those values among citizens,

so they really know what they have

I am going to put examples that already exist, for example in the city of New York.

This is the New York city street tree map.

Here you can see, by clicking on any tree, the ecological benefits that the tree represents for citizens,

with the percentage of rain interception and the economic value that this means, the energy conserved every year, the polluting air that really fixed, etc.,

and all of this is quantified economically

How do they do that?

In principle is how much money is saved management because that particular tree fixes such amount of contaminant, etc.

Here the total value of all the trees of New York

in terms of interception of water and rain, of the energy conserved year, of the reduction of the carbon dioxide, etc

And the total annual value of the benefits would be 111 million dollars.

That is a way to propose a fixed and economic valuation of these trees,

and that helps the citizen to realize that value also, in addition to the intrinsic one that each tree.

There are other tools that help you quantify these interesting variables of the tree,

such as the Lidar tool to know the toptree surface, which is almost the most important.

It is not only having a tree in itself, it has to have a good foliage,

good health, and a crown that fixes and synthesizes, etc.

We are trying to make a valuation method that quantifies and is a mixed proposal

to develop a model more in line with the situation of Spanish municipalities

It would be three steps that we would do first in an inventory:

first, plan and design that database,

then collect data in the field

I'll explain how we do to make it more visual and then can fit in Google Maps or similar tools.

And then exporting and processing data and publishing the inventory.

What we do is talk to the city council and we put together the variables we want to properly assess the trees:

location gps, height, top diameter and base,

and then aspects such as sanitary status, soil compaction, if the tree wells are covered or not, the inclination of the branches ...

That is the most important of the inventory, to come to and understanding.

And look for easily measurable variables, with dropdowns that help you do it quickly and properly.

This database is displayed in google maps or another graphic file

with the idea that this serves for the citizen to visualize it,

with an access from the web site of the town hall where you can see what species there are,

where they are and any other variables that we want put.

Once all this is achieved, the next step is management.

The inventory is useless if we do not have a management plan:

what we have, what we have done wrong and how we can change it, where we are going in the future

This is the idea of the management plan

An assessment is made, for example, of what anomalies there are in the city:

insufficient tree wells, signaling and facade conflict,

inadequate planting framework, soil anomalies, etc.

All these things are quantified and typified

and so the technician sees very clearly what problems the city has.

You know what you have and how to manage it, now where are we going?

The management plan goes hand in hand with urbanism,

and having it we already have something to support us, very solid,

because it must be backed by all the politicians, fifteen or twenty years from now.

This helps to close the work and to see that our work with the tree has a certain development, also consensual.

Disclosure, what can be done?

With the inventory you can check the species and the highlighted tabs on the web and somehow get people to interact

For example, the realization a small guide or signage, that put in value the trees.

For example, this is very curious, the label that have placed this tree: "this tree is worth $ 1425"

Or this tree is valued at $ 193.250, for all it does

We always try to make known the management plans, making participation days between people.

It is also very interesting to develop tourist products:

people like to go see and tell them something, like when they go to see cathedrals or museums.

Why do not we take them to see trees?

In 'Bosques sin Fronteras' ('Forest Without Borders') we have a program called "Embrace Your Trees".

It is about going to see trees and tell people what they are seeing,

the history, tradition and culture of these trees.

We have also developed some tree tour guides, this way people can see and participate.

We also had gastronomic days connected to the tree-lined tourist routes,

so we saw them and took tapas, and people liked it.

You have to find ways to change people's mindset and those studies that are done, many times magnificent,

have to go hand in hand with original initiatives that engage people.

Another beautiful idea from Forest without Borders is the arboretum of clones, biodiversity arborets.

. It is a question of collecting seeds from some areas of a community

and then looking for municipalities that want to plant these trees

and create forests that are representative of their space.

We are promoting biodiversity arborets

and it is also a way to introduce society to the world of the tree and to know interesting aspects of it

Well, this is the philosophy we work with.

And, or we get to do things or soon the tree will be in the archaeological museum of the twenty-first century,

because it seems to me that we are going to worse

We have to work together and see that this is possible,

that there are ways to change perspective

For more infomation >> Conferencia Susana Domínguez: 'Planes de gestión de arbolado urbano en municipios" - Duration: 17:36.

-------------------------------------------

Escuchar la voz de Dios - Duration: 3:38.

How I hear the voice of God.

Have you ever tried to hear the voice

God, but simply could not say

if it was yours or not?

What is stopping you listening?

There are two problems we need to talk about.

The first is that we can't recognise

God's voice.

And the second is easier.

The volume of the world and our lives

is so high.

Let's start with the first thing.

The best way to know God's voice

is through the Holy Scriptures.

God's voice will help form

your conscience.

Where the Catholic Church says:

Deep within his conscience,

man discovers a law

which he has not laid upon himself,

but which he must obey.

Its voice, ever calling him to love and

to do what is good,

and avoid what is evil.

When he hears his conscience, man

hears the voice of God,

but his awareness needs to be formed.

The key word is "formed".

Our hearts need to be formed

through the Holy Scriptures

and the sacred traditions

of the Catholic Church.

We need to allow the Church to take

from the Scriptures the most profound meaning

so that we may drink freely

from them,

as from a water well.

And now for the second issue: the volume

of the world and our lives is very high.

God's voice speaking

in our formed hearts, has no

opportunity to be heard,

because it is drowning in the

noise of our lives.

We need to lower the volume

and sit in the silence of the presence

of Almighty God.

Because He wishes to talk.

Here's another question:

Why we can hear the world

and all its opinions,

but we cannot hear the truth

of God Himself?

The answer is simple:

The world has many opinions,

and they are strong, and in your face,

but God, though... God is gentle.

What prevents us from listening?

God is not strong in his way of speaking,

but subtle and kind.

God is not shouting, but softly,

he is inviting us to live in Him.

Let us remove the noise of our lives.

And let us turn the volume of this world down.

So that the voice of God

during this Lent

may bring us closer to the victory of the Holy Cross.

Let us open the Holy Scriptures,

not only to read them but to pray.

And to hear more clearly the voice

of our first Love.

Please leave your message below

and share this video

during this Lent.

May God bless you. Goodbye

For more infomation >> Escuchar la voz de Dios - Duration: 3:38.

-------------------------------------------

Destaques Sessão Plenária 29 de março 2017 - Duration: 2:28.

For more infomation >> Destaques Sessão Plenária 29 de março 2017 - Duration: 2:28.

-------------------------------------------

ACORDO SONY/MARVEL TERMINA DEPOIS DA SEQUELA DE HOMEM-ARANHA - Duration: 2:23.

ACORDO SONY/MARVEL TERMINA DEPOIS DA SEQUELA DE HOMEM-ARANHA

Amy Pascal, que era quem estava à frente da Sony Pictures quando o acordo com a Marvel para partilha do Homem-Aranha foi conseguido, sugeriu que tudo pode terminar depois da sequela de Regresso a Casa.

Amy continua produtora executiva do filme, que ontem viu a estreia de mais um trailer, e esteve a promovê-lo na CinemaCon, altura em que fez a revelação dos contornos do acordo, já depois de elogiar a colaboração entre os dois estúdios.

Uma das coisas que penso ser fantásticas acerca desta experiência, é que não vês dois estúdios a decidir fazer um filme juntos todos os dias. Isso pode não voltar a acontecer. depois de fazermos a sequela..

A Sony, Disney e Marvel decidiram em conjunto que o melhor a fazer era permitir que Peter Parker, o Homem-Aranha, estivesse no UCM, trabalhando com as pessoas da Marvel para que eles produzissem o filme, penso que é uma coisa rara para as companhias, foi brilhante porque há um limite para as histórias que podes contar uma e outra vez, sobre o aranhiço, isto é algo que nunca poderíamos fazer de outra forma.

Assim, foi algo muito altruísta e inteligente por parte das companhias..

O novo filme do Homem-Aranha: Regresso a Casa, estreia no próximo dia 7 de julho de 2017. De seguida, podem apreciar uma galeria com todos os posters do Homem-Aranha no cinema:.

Aníbal Gonçalves é um entusiasta de videojogos, editor do IGN Portugal e completo geek nos tempos livres. Podes segui-lo em.