Thứ Tư, 31 tháng 1, 2018

Waching daily Jan 31 2018

black bean noodles (jjajang) VS spicy seafood noodles (jjampong)

pouring VS dipping sauce (sweet-sour pork)

cold soup noodles VS noodles served with soy sauce (Lo mein)

Wow, so difficult...

Lo mein? or cold noodles?

Cold soup noodles?

Americano VS Latte

Both are eliminated!

fried chicken VS seasoned chicken

What to choose?

seasoned chicken

fried chicken VS seasoned chicken

Is there half-half?

Half-half

fried chicken VS seasoned chicken

Chicken leg VS chicken breast

Summer VS Winter

text message VS (talking on) phone

Text message and talking on the phone. Both are the same.

- How can you be contacted? -I like meeting up the most.

Top VS bottom (bunk bed)

medium VS well-done (chicken steak)

pork VS beef

sleep VS breakfast

egg VS no egg (in ramyeon)

coke VS cider

I don't like either.

soybean paste stew (Doenjang-jjigae) VS kimchi stew (Kimchi-jjigae)

male vs female (reborn in your next life as)

love vs friendship

No, friendship, frienship.

love vs friendship *greedy person* - I want both.

love vs friendship

love vs friendship *romantic guy

singing vs dancing

This time both as well.

singing vs dancing

moving vs laying around (after eating full)

(first start with) delicious vs not-so-delicious (food)

cream sauce vs tomato sauce (spaghetti)

tank top vs skinny pants

tank top VS skinny pants *an expression showing not liking both

tank top vs skinny pants

knife dance vs obsession-dol

*shy

Me? Always aegyo.

*smile

One year without manager VS one year without cell phone

For more infomation >> [ENG SUB] 180130 INFINITE news Ade - VS battle ? - Duration: 4:36.

-------------------------------------------

Anticipazioni Uomini e donne 1° febbraio: Gemma umiliata... |Hot News 24h - Duration: 4:10.

For more infomation >> Anticipazioni Uomini e donne 1° febbraio: Gemma umiliata... |Hot News 24h - Duration: 4:10.

-------------------------------------------

Design Time | Series 3 - Fake News, Part 1 - Duration: 3:10.

[inspirational rock music plays]

[dramatic ambient pads play]

Voice Over - "Designing to meet multiple learning styles results in better learning

outcomes for students."

"We remember 10% of what we read,

but we remember 90% of what we do."

"Young people are digital natives and instinctively know now to use technology."

"Right brained people are more creative so it's important to...

design creative assignments to help them learn."

[Light music plays]

Dawn: We believe a lot of things about learning...

and much of what we believe we've read somewhere,

or heard at a conference, and we believe it because we trust experts or because...

it seems to make sense, or fits neatly into our own experience.

But in reality, a lot of what gets passed off as fact in learning is neither supported by actual research,

nor even logical when you think about it carefully, and that has an impact on design decisions.

You need to know what works and designed towards that,

not some myths that are repeated over and over again.

Welcome to our latest Design Time series 'Fake News Separating Fact From Fiction' in learning.

This series will seek to dispel some of the most common learning myths

that you've probably heard and give you some tools to better separate the fact from the fiction.

Ready? Okay let's get started!

[Light music swells, then fades with the image]

Carolyn: Now a side note before we begin.

We're not here to tout how smart we are,

or to make you feel badly for believing some of these myths.

All of us believe one or more of these myths at one time or another.

What we are trying to do,

is to help you to know why you know something and to know that it's true and verifiable.

Only by doing that can you ensure that the design decisions you

make are grounded in solid verifiable research and best practices.

Some of what you will hear today might seriously challenge beliefs you currently hold,

and that might make you feel uncomfortable - that's natural.

Nobody likes to think that something you believed is true is in fact not.

All we ask is that you consider what you hear and keep an open mind.

To help with that, we've provided a list of resources...

Some on research that dispels these myths and some that will

help you to tune your radar a little better to spot learning myths in the first place.

So check these resources out.

We think they make a compelling case to support what we tell you today

See what you think.

Now let's get on with this new Design Time series -

'Fake News, Separating Fact from Fiction',

and it's time for the news!

Christian: Thanks for joining us today!

Click on the left to watch the next video in this series,

or click on the right to watch another video from our channel,

and don't forget to click the center channel icon to subscribe.

Thanks for watching!

For more infomation >> Design Time | Series 3 - Fake News, Part 1 - Duration: 3:10.

-------------------------------------------

'염력' 연상호 감독 "새로운 영화를 오래하고 싶다" - News 24H - Duration: 21:09.

For more infomation >> '염력' 연상호 감독 "새로운 영화를 오래하고 싶다" - News 24H - Duration: 21:09.

-------------------------------------------

Design Time | Series 3 - Fake News, Part 2 - Duration: 4:14.

[inspirational rock music plays]

[dramatic news theme music plays]

Christian: Good evening and welcome to Design Time news, I'm Christian Drennen.

Our top story tonight - my mustache looks fantastic...

But first we got a bit of breaking news

coming out of the Online Learning Consortium conference in Orlando Florida

it seems investors in learning style inventories have been met with the fact

that designing to meet learning styles doesn't really help students learn.

This news comes out of a talk given at the O.L.C. conference from the University of Cincinnati...

Let's go over to Carolyn who is on the scene with a report - Carolyn?

Carolyn: Thanks Christian!

Yes it's complete chaos here outside the Online Learning Consortium conference,

where this news has just broken, in a fantastic presentation

given by a group from the University of Cincinnati, it turns out

that learning styles are a complete myth!

I... uh, excuse me sir - can I, can I talk to you for a moment?

Passerby: Yes, yes, sure... Carolyn: Oh awesome!

Carolyn: I have, here, a typical conference attendee, who was at this fantastic presentation.

So, tell me sir...

what was your opinion of learning styles before you saw the presentation?

Passerby: Well, before the presentation I was under the assumption that I was a visual learner,

as opposed to an auditory learner.

Carolyn: Is that right?

And now, after the presentation, what do you think now?

Passerby: I believe, now, that learning styles are

just a myth and it's not an effective way to design a course.

That's great.

Thank you sir, thank you so much for your time!

Well, there you have it!

Carolyn: This is the reaction of everyone I've talked to they're stunned that learning styles

isn't a real thing - because it makes so much sense.

If you prefer to get information in a particular format, say, video or text, that must mean you'll

learn better if you're given that information in that format, right?

Christian: Right Carolyn!

Carolyn: Wrong Christian...

According to today's fantastic presentation, the truth is

that study, after study, has failed to find a link between a person's stated

preference for learning and whether or not they actually learned something.

In fact, we were hard-pressed to find a valid study that did definitively prove

that designing to meet a learning style was effective.

Carolyn: Those studies that support learning styles are very suspect.

Christian: and why is that Carolyn?

Carolyn: Well one of the primary reasons is that learning styles are almost always determined by

learners self-reporting their preferences, which any experienced researcher will tell

you is a notoriously bad way to gather data.

So, any data from a self-reported

learning style inventory is suspect right off the bat.

There's also the fact that how you prefer to do something doesn't

necessarily mean that's the most effective way to do it.

Christian: So, Carolyn, tell us how these myths about learning styles actually got started.

Carolyn: Well for one thing, as we already said, it feels right; it seems to make sense.

But, if designing to meet learning styles does not actually result in better learning outcomes for students,

then what it seems or feels like doesn't matter, you're just wasting

time on a design approach that doesn't work.

Another reason is that learning style inventories apparently are big business.

A Google search for learning styles inventory returned more than eight million results.

Some of these inventories catalog up to 71 different learning styles, and are accompanied by

strategies to help you meet each particular style.

So there's an obvious motivation to sell this idea in the learning industry.

But can you imagine designing a class for 71 different learning styles?

So, back over to you Christian!

Christian: Wow! No, no I can't imagine creating that many learning styles in a course.

So, thank you Carolyn for that in-depth report from the scene.

Up next we have more breaking news on competing learning myths.

Stay with us, we'll be right back after these commercial messages.

[dramatic news music plays]

Christian: Thanks for joining us today.

Click on the left to watch the next video in this series...

or click on the right to watch another video from our channel,

and don't forget to click the center channel icon to subscribe.

Thanks for watching!

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét