Thứ Ba, 3 tháng 4, 2018

Waching daily Apr 4 2018

In a new round of evaluations, five of seven small SUVs earned good ratings for occupant

protection in our passenger-side small overlap test.

Drivers and front-seat passengers should get equal protection in small overlap crashes,

regardless of what side of the vehicle the impact point is on.

In 2017, the Institute launched the passenger-side small overlap crash test.

The goal is to ensure that changes made by manufacturers to improve driver-side performance

are also being made to the passenger side in cases where there is an impact on the passenger side.

The small overlap crash test represents a real-world crash where only a quarter of the

vehicle's front end strikes a tree or a post at 40 miles per hour.

The BMW X1 is an example of a vehicle that earns good ratings on both the driver and

passenger side for small overlap.

On the passenger side, you can see that the structure is well-maintained, allowing for

survival space of the occupant inside.

The safety belts and the frontal and curtain airbags also did a good job of protecting

the dummy inside from hitting any hard structures.

The Ford Escape struggled in the passenger-side test.

In 2017 Ford reinforced the structure on the driver side of the Escape to improve performance

but didn't make the same changes to the passenger side.

The occupant compartment was severely compromised.

Parts of the safety cage came rearward and inward towards the occupant.

If this were a real-world crash, a passenger would likely have sustained a right hip injury.

Side curtain airbag protection is important in small overlap impacts because occupants'

heads are vulnerable to striking side structures or objects outside of the vehicle.

However, in the Outlander Sport and Escape, the side curtain airbag did not deploy.

This is not something we expect to see after so many years of crash testing.

The side curtain airbags should have deployed in these crashes.

Good or acceptable performance in the passenger-side small overlap test is a requirement for the

2018 TOP SAFETY PICK+ award, along with good-rated headlights.

None of the small SUVs qualified for this distinction, mainly because they fell short

for headlight ratings.

The Outlander, however, is one of the nine small SUVs we've tested so far that qualifies

for the regular TOP SAFETY PICK award.

For more infomation >> New passenger-side ratings for 7 small SUVs - IIHS News - Duration: 2:40.

-------------------------------------------

California Has Problem With Authority, Trump Just Spanked Them With Bad News - Duration: 5:11.

California Has Problem With Authority, Trump Just Spanked Them With Bad News

Rebellious California has a serious problem with authority, and President Donald Trump

just spanked them with some bad news that you don't want to miss.

It's about time the Golden State learned a little something about federal law.

According to Fox News, the extreme environmentalists in Sacramento have just gotten a rude awakening

from Trump's EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt after he announced that some of the federally

approved privileges that California enjoys are going to be re-examined.

Most notably, Pruitt talked about the radical Obama-era emissions regulations and California's

previous push to have even stricter emissions laws than the federal government.

On Tuesday, April 3, 2018, Pruitt laid out his plan to roll back Obama-era fuel standards

which many see as a huge win for the automakers and the American economy.

This is bad news for California, which more or less leads the way for over a dozen states

with emissions regulations that surpass those passed by the EPA.

As a result, the Golden State has driven many businesses to other states and hurt their

own economy with unreasonable emissions controls.

In regard to federal regulations, Pruitt said, "These standards that were set were inappropriate

and need to be revised," during a speech at the EPA in Washington D.C., adding that

the rules are too expensive and hurt car buyers by making vehicles costlier.

Pruitt spoke directly about his goals and specific reasons for wanting to roll-back

Obama-era emissions regulations.

"The focus should be on making cars that people actually buy and that are efficient,"

he said.

Pruitt's decision to overhaul the nation's first carbon limits on automobiles, which

requires cars and light trucks sold in the U.S. to average more than 50 miles per gallon

by 2025, shows a joint effort between the country's automakers and the Trump administration

to re-create a decimated car industry.

"This was the right decision, and we support the Administration for pursuing a data-driven

effort and a single national program as it works to finalize future standards," the

Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, which includes Ford, General Motors, and Fiat Chrysler,

said in a statement.

"We appreciate that the Administration is working to find a way to both increase fuel

economy standards and keep new vehicles affordable to more Americans."

The announcement wasn't music to everyone's ears, however.

California immediately pushed back as the EPA's announcement went public.

Now, a legal battle over California's privilege to have stricter emissions regulations than

the federal government is sure to ensue.

California passed its own Clean Air Act in 1970, allowing it to set its own greenhouse

gas emissions standards.

The liberal run state is able to maintain that kind of autonomy based on a waiver it

has with the federal government, which Pruitt now says will be under review.

The smack talk had already begun a day earlier in Sacramento, according to the Associated

Press.

"The Trump Administration's assault on clean car standards risks our ability to protect

our children's health, tackle climate change, and save hardworking Americans money," California's

militant Attorney General Xavier Becerra said in a statement on Monday.

"We're ready to file suit if needed to protect these critical standards and to fight

the Administration's war on our environment.

California didn't become the sixth-largest economy in the world by spectating," Becerra

added.Over a dozen other state attorney generals joined Becerra on Monday to rebuke the Trump

administration for the rollback calling it "irrational and irresponsible" while vowing

to "vigorously and aggressively challenge President Trump's dangerous anti-environmental

agenda in court."

Pruitt handled the situation with class.

In regard to California's nasty attitude, he said that "Cooperative federalism doesn't

mean that one state can dictate standards for the rest of the country."

"EPA will set a national standard for greenhouse gas emissions that allows auto manufacturers

to make cars that people both want and can afford — while still expanding environmental

and safety benefits of newer cars," he added.

"It is in America's best interest to have a national standard, and we look forward to

partnering with all states, including California, as we work to finalize that standard."

I applaud President Donald Trump and his EPA boss Scott Pruitt for taking the bull by the

horns.

States like California think they are above federal law in so many different ways.

As the Golden State politicians get ready for a legal battle over emissions regulations,

it will be interesting to see them try to convince their voters that living under needless

and expensive regulations is better.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét