- Brotsanbert is one of the best cannabic lawyers office in Spain. We talked with them in Thc Valencia...
- They revealed a few incongruences of the system agaisnt cannabic activists.
- We've come to talk about drogo test... How our processes at constituonal work... We've got a bad new...
- Not surpising because the last sentences are being really conservative... And it says that
- like all of we know... Constituional question we presented to court in Vitoria,
- the judge, understanding the law as not constitutional, traffic law wich punish only via presence of drugs in
- your body while driving... As simple as that sounds. Constitutional court didn't admitted it but their resolution
- is that cannabis presence in your body affects to driving capacities. It means... Juridic aberration. Only for havin
- a molecule, a person can be punished without subjective proves about its affectation to drive.
- We're studying a resource to Human Rights court and other resource for a therapeutic member of an association
- and we're waiting for a better answer but we has no great hope... We'll do all we can to fight this.
- It seems constitutional court has it really clear... They don't valuate the reality,
- from a moral point of view, navarra law has been destroyed... And catalan and basque laws seems to follow
- the same way... And Ebers sentence with fundamental rights vulnerated... They'll repeat the process
- but you can understand their ideology. Drug addicition is a problem all around the world
- and that all initiatives to secure consumption, it's a protection to something they consideer as morally incorrect.
- Yes, we're wainting for PANAC case... Constitutional admited it for not being a regular case...
- Over any kind of tecnic question... It's an important case at social level, also economic
- level and we understand that answer cannot be so simple. Or well or bad, we're waiting for an answer
- and acceptation... Without other motives that should drive to absolution, not only repeating the process.
- There's an important ellement in Panac's case. They consolidated right's reallity... Shared collective cultivation
- avaled by continuated absolutions giving them back their plants... Without interventions being from Panac...
- Avaled by basque courts and even basque police. Prohibitionism point of view by constitutional court
- avoids a lot of realities... They can't hide it.
- Absolute sentence of Besaya Bowling, that wanted to reflect it was an error, but the basis is a previous archive.
- Not cannabis returning... Only money return... So Panac' case should be absolved
- in constitutional court. We've recently got another absolution in Canary Islands
- of a grower that owned 13.5kg... Evidently it wasn't and weight in was erroneous. At the end it's like with clubs
- jurisprudence with wich it seems a few courts are opener... At penal level we get even marihuana returns
- and even in provitial audiences... But then the high courts... In connection with political power,
- make these kind of initiatives to fall down, even coming from other courts. We must fight for our rights.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét