When President Donald Trump signed the "ridiculous" and massive $1.3 trillion omnibus spending
bill on Friday, he himself decried the "wasteful spending" and "giveaways" to Democrats
that had been tucked into the legislation while he also vowed to never sign another
bill like it.
Many conservatives were also incensed at the obscene spending bill, most notably due to
continued taxpayer funding for abortion provider Planned Parenthood and sanctuary cities, but
also because it seemed like Democrats completely blocked Trump's efforts at building a wall
to secure the southern border, granting him a paltry $1.6 billion to repair existing border
fences.
The lone obvious bright spot of the spending bill was the ample funding — more than had
been requested actually — for the military, which Trump repeatedly made note of.
But while many set their hair on fire and appeared to jump off the Trump train in dismay
as Democrats cheerfully crowed about how they had stymied a major part of Trump's agenda,
others kept a level head and began to dig deep among the 2,200-plus pages — and all
referenced statutes mentioned therein — in search of some hidden reason why the president
had signed this bloated spending bill into law instead of sending it back with a veto.
That search was bolstered somewhat by a letter sent on Saturday from the White House to both
chambers of Congress which cited a specific statute from the funds-governing 1985 Budget
Control Act in relation to a specific section of the new spending bill, and declared that
certain funding had been designated as an "emergency requirement," which some believe
grants the president legal authority to shift funds around and prioritize spending — or
even not spend at all — certain funds in relation to declared emergencies, in this
case specifically as they pertain to national defense.
Thus, theories began to circulate that Trump had somehow snuck funding for the oft-promised
border wall past the not-so-watchful eyes of arrogantly ignorant Democrats — and a
few establishment Republicans — opposed to his agenda who didn't bother to carefully
read the bill … as if they even had time to do so if they wanted to, perhaps by cynical
design of both sides.
Consider that the New York Post reported that during the signing ceremony on Friday, Trump
had stated, "I want to address the situation on border security, which I call national
defense.
I call it stopping drugs from pouring across our border.
And I call it illegal immigration.
It's all of those things."
"But national defense is a very important two words," he added.
"Because by having a strong border system, including a wall, we are in a position, militarily,
that is very advantageous."
Then Trump tweeted on Sunday, "Because of the $700 & $716 Billion gotten to rebuild
our Military, many jobs are created and our Military is again rich.
Building a great Border Wall, with drugs (poison) and enemy combatants pouring into our Country,
is all about National Defense.
Build WALL through M!"
That has been understood by some to insinuate that Trump intended to immediately begin to
build the border wall by way of the military with use of military funding — most likely
through the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers — as he has previously declared the drug problem
to be a "national health emergency" and specified border security as part of "national
defense."
Furthermore, an article from July 2017 by U.S. News and World Report — which probably
garnered minimal attention when initially published — began to circulate online again
which seemed to lend credence to the theory that Trump would use military funding and
the Corps of Engineers to construct the border wall.
That article lamented how the House Rules Committee had quietly adopted an amendment
to the Department of Defense appropriations bill for Fiscal Year 2018, which struck out
language inserted by the House Armed Services Committee, that had specifically prohibited
Defense funds from being used for border wall construction, thus allowing for those same
funds to now be shifted toward the "national defense" priority of border security.
To be sure, there is admittedly a fair bit of speculation involved in the theories that
Trump will use the military and Pentagon funding to construct the border wall, and it is possible
that Trump and the Department of Homeland Security really are limited funding-wise on
border wall construction for the moment.
That said, there are those who sincerely believe that Trump really is the self-proclaimed "very
stable genius" who somehow manages to stay a step or two ahead of those opponents intent
on tripping him up and stopping his agenda.
If true, then it is highly likely that Trump did indeed figure out a way to side-step the
obstructionists in Congress with a clever plan to legally divert military funding toward
the border wall, for "national defense" and "emergency" purposes.
We will now await the weeping and gnashing of teeth from Democrats once they realize
how Trump just pulled a fast one on them.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét