ANOTHER MOTHER WANTS YOU TO SEE WHAT AN HPV VACCINE INJURY LOOKS LIKE
Gardasil, the vaccine that supposedly protects youngsters against four types of human papillomavirus,
or HPV, and the cervical cancer which it can lead to, has come under intense scrutiny from
medical professionals around the world over the past few years. This is due to the fact
that a number of cases reporting adverse reactions to the HPV vaccine have been surfacing more.
We�ve published multiple articles regarding adverse reactions to the HPV vaccine, here�s
one about mother of a vaccine injured child who has decided to showcase her challenges
to the public, with hopes that some will see exactly what it means to deal with the consequences
of an uninformed medical decision. To follow her story, see this link to her Facebook page.
We�ve also recently published an article regarding 18 more teenaged girls who have
come forward claiming that they are suffering from acute physical side effects from the
HPV anti-cervical vaccine.
This is why multiple countries, like Japan do not recommend it as part of their routinely
vaccination schedule for children, and perhaps this is why more doctors are not recommending
it to patients.
For example, a new study recently published in the journal Pediatrics has found that many
paediatricians don�t strongly recommend the HPV vaccine. Researchers used a national
survey asking approximately 600 doctors to outline their stance on the HPV vaccine. Conducted
between October 2013 and January 2014, the study found that a large percentage of paediatricians
and family doctors � nearly one third of those surveyed � are not strongly recommending
the HPV vaccine to parents and preteens, which is why HPV vaccination rates continue to drop.
�When one looks at the independent literature, so studies that are not sponsored by the vaccine
manufacturers, um, so with relation to Gardasil there have been several reports documenting
multiple sclerosis and encephalitis, which is brain inflammation, in girls who have received
their Gardasil vaccine, so, just because a study sponsored by the manufacturers does
not identify problems with the vaccine does not necessarily mean the vaccine is safe.
Um, in fact if one looks at the manufacturer studies, they�re often not designed to detect
serious adverse events. There was a study done by a group of researchers sponsored by
Glaxo Smith and Kline and they were looking at Cervarix, which is another HPV vaccine,
and the authors acknowledged that none of the studies that they evaluated have been
designed to detect autoimmune diseases. So obviously, you�re not going to find what
you�re not looking for. And in spite of these obvious flaws, they concluded that there
is no evidence that Cervarix is associated with, um, increased risk for autoimmune diseases,
and this is absurd because you haven�t looked for it, the study has not been designed to
detect autoimmune diseases.� � Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic, PhD, Post-doctoral Fellow at
the University of British Columbia where she works in Neurosciences and the Department
of Medicine
The truth is that vaccine safety is not at all rock solid, and serious adverse reactions
following routine vaccinations in children have always been reported, and seemingly underreported,
in my opinion. Perhaps this is why billions of dollars have been paid out to families
through the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, despite the fact that it protects pharmaceutical
companies for any blame.
Plus, we have yet to identify genetic factors that make a certain population more prone
to adverse reactions.
Injuries include deaths, permanent neurological damage, disabling autoimmune and/or inflammatory
conditions have also been clearly described in scientific literature. Here is a great
article written by Tomljenovic, quoted above, going into more detail.
In-fact, she recently published a study in the Journal Immunologic Research documenting
more concerns with the HPV vaccine.
Below is a clip from the recently released film, Vaxxed, of a boy named Colton and his
mother Kathleen who share his story of vaccine injury following the Gardasil vaccine with
the Vaxxed team in Oren. Another story that will hopefully spark more questions and dialogue
within the mainstream medical community.
More Information from CE About the HPV Vaccine
Dr. Dianne Harper, one of a select few specialists in OB/GYN (in the world) who helped design
and carry out the Phase II and Phase III safety and effectiveness studies to get Gardasil
approved. There are only 50 HPV experts in the world, and Dr. Harper is one of them,
inarguably making her an expert on the subject.
She brings up an interesting point, that of all the women who get an HPV infection, approximately
70 percent of those will clear that infection all by themselves in the first year. You don�t
even have to detect it or treat it. Within two years, approximately 90 percent of those
women will clear it all by themselves. By three years, you will have 10 percent of that
original group of women left who still have an HPV infection, and 5 percent of this 10
percent will have progressed into a pre-cancerous lesion. So, �now you have that small group
of women who have pre-cancerous lesions and now let�s look at that moving into invasive
carcinoma. What we know then is that amongst women with. [pre-cancerous] lesions. it takes
five years for about twenty percent of them to become invasive carcinomas. That�s a
pretty slow process. It takes about thirty years for forty percent of them to become
invasive cervical carcinomas.�
This begs the question, why do nine-year old girls need vaccinations for symptomless venereal
diseases that their immune systems kill anyway?
Harper has told CBS that these vaccines are essentially useless, explaining that �the
benefit to public health is nothing, there is no reduction in cervical cancers, they
are just postponed, unless the protection lasts for at least 15 years, and over 70%
of all sexually active females of all ages are vaccinated.�
She also goes on to caution of their dangers:
Parents and women must know that deaths occurred. Not all deaths that have been reported were
represented in Dr. Slade�s work, one-third of the death reports were unavailable to the
CDC, leaving the parents of the deceased teenagers in despair that the CDC is ignoring the very
rare but real occurrences that need not have happened if parents were given information
stating that there are real, but small risks of death surrounding the administration of
Gardasil.
�It is a vaccine that�s been highly marketed, the benefits are over-hyped, and the dangers
are underestimated.� � Dr. Chris Shaw, Professor at the University of British Columbia,
in the department of Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, and Visual Sciences (Taken from the One More
Girl documentary)
(Gardasil) To �Very Rare But Serious Condition.�
�It has recently come to the attention of the College that one of the recommended vaccines
could possibly be associated with the very rare but serious condition of premature ovarian
failure (POF), also known as premature menopause. There have been two case report series (3
cases each) published since 2013 in which post-menarcheal adolescent girls developed
laboratory documented POF within weeks to several years of receiving Gardasil, a four-strain
human papillomavirus vaccine (HPV4).�
The press release goes on to state that adverse reactions are not commonly caused by the vaccine,
and that there has not been a noticeable rise in POF cases in the last 9 years that the
vaccine has been widely used. This is not the first time a statement from a government
medical agency has contradicted the evidence of various scientists and doctors around the
world. Nevertheless, it�s great to see them at least acknowledge these potentials, stating
that there are �legitimate concerns that should be addressed.�
Dr. Genevieve Rail, Professor of Critical Studies of Health at Concordia University,
recently received a grant of $270,000 from the Canadian Institute for Health Research
(CIHR) to study the Human Papillomavirus (HPV). She concluded that there is absolutely no
proof that the human papillomavirus directly causes cervical cancer.
�I�m sort of raising a red flag, out of respect for what I�ve found in my own study,
and for the despair of parents who had totally perfect 12-year-olds who are now in their
beds, too tired to go to school,� she said. �Yes, we�re going against the grain, and
we are going against those who are believed, i.e. doctors and nurses and people in public
health.�
She feels there are �serious concerns� about the vaccine, yet no research on how
young people �experience� the vaccine.
Gardasil Contains More Than Double The Amount Of Aluminum Than It Previously Had
Gardasil, like several other vaccines, contains aluminum. Health authorities will tell you
that using aluminum as an adjuvant in vaccines is completely safe, but what they won�t
tell you is that there are no safety assessments (toxicity studies) for vaccine ingredients.
This can be quite eye-opening for those who were not already aware of this, especially
considering the fact that aluminum has been being added to vaccines for approximately
90 years. Yet the Food and Drug Administration, or any other government agency for that matter,
has not conducted or included appropriate toxicity studies/testing proving the safety
of aluminum. Why is this? One reason could be that vaccines have traditionally (over
the years) been viewed as non-toxic substances, therefore not warranting such research.
�I have a document from 2002 from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)� discussing
the assessment of vaccine ingredients� and testing specifically in animal models. Back
then, the FDA stated that the routine toxicity studies in animals with vaccine ingredients
have not been conducted because it was assumed that these ingredients are safe. When I read
that I was kind of pulling my hairs out [thinking] �So, this is your indisputable evidence
of safety?� These documents never made it to mainstream media. It�s just a lie perpetuated
over and over again; that we�ve been using these things for over nine decades and it�s
been proven safe. No, it�s been assumed safe.�
� Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic
Even if we look at the FDA�s current website/guidelines, this is not a secret. The statement above
was made in response to their 2002 guidelines, which is a fairly recent document. More than
10 years later, however, despite all of the studies demonstrating clear cause for concern,
not much has changed.
�Until recently, few licensed vaccines have been tested for developmental toxicity in
animals prior to their use in humans.�
Studies also continue to emerge every single year stressing the need to actually test vaccine
ingredients for safety. You�d think this would be a no-brainer, wouldn�t you?
Here is a study published in 2015 that stresses how important it is for us to further examine
the inclusion of mercury and aluminum in vaccines, arguing that �the safety levels of these
substances have never been determined, either for animals or for adult humans�much less
for fetuses, newborns, infants, and children.�
A growing number of studies have linked the use of aluminum adjuvants to serious autoimmune
outcomes in humans.
Below is an excerpt from a paper that was published in 2015 in the journal Frontiers
In Neurology which emphasizes various concerns about aluminum in vaccines:
The conceptual link between long-term persistence of alum particles within macrophages at the
site of previous immunization, and the occurrence of adverse systemic events, in particular
neurological ones, has long remained an unsolved question. Aluminum has long been identified
as a neurotoxic metal, affecting memory, cognition and psychomotor control, altering neurotransmission
and synaptic activity, damaging the blood�brain barrier (BBB), exerting pro-oxidant effects,
activating microglia and neuroinflammation, depressing the cerebral glucose metabolism
and mitochondrial functions, interfering with transcriptional activity, and promoting beta-amyloid
and neurofilament aggregation . In addition, alum particles impact the immune system through
their adjuvant effect and by many other means. They adsorb vaccine antigens on their surface,
which protect them from proteolysis thus forming a persistently immunogenic pseudo-pathogen
. Alum particles may also bind undesirable residual products inherent to vaccine production
procedures, as shown for HPV DNA sequences or yeast proteins that may be potentially
hazardous . Finally, alum particles can directly induce allergy as other metals Concerns about
long-term biopersistence of alum largely depend on the ability of alum particles to reach
and exert toxicity in remote organs. This ability has been suggested by several studies.
Here is another paper, published in 2013 in the journal Immunome Research, which provides
further evidence of the dangers associated with aluminum in vaccines.
A study published in the journal Current Medical Chemistry in 2011 does the same:
Aluminum is an experimentally demonstrated neurotoxin and the most commonly used vaccine
adjuvant. Despite almost 90 years of widespread use of aluminum adjuvants, medical science�s
understanding about their mechanisms of action is still remarkably poor. There is also a
concerning scarcity of data on toxicology and pharmacokinetics of these compounds. In
spite of this, the notion that aluminum in vaccines is safe appears to be widely accepted.
Experimental research, however, clearly shows that aluminum adjuvants have a potential to
induce serious immunological disorders in humans. In particular, aluminum in adjuvant
form carries a risk for autoimmunity, long-term brain inflammation and associated neurological
complications and may thus have profound and widespread adverse health consequences.
Another one published in the Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry shared the following conclusions:
We show that Al-adjuvanted vaccines may be a significant etiological factor in the rising
prevalence of ASD. We also show that children from countries with the highest ASD prevalence
appear to have a much higher exposure to Al from vaccines, particularly at 2 months of
age. According to the FDA, vaccines represent a special category of drugs as they are generally
given to healthy individuals . Further according to the FDA, �this places significant emphasis
on their [vaccine] safety� . While the FDA does set an upper limit for Al in vaccines
at no more than 850 �g/dose , it is important to note that this amount was selected empirically
from data showing that Al in such amounts enhanced the antigenicity of the vaccine,
rather than from existing safety data or from the basis of toxicological considerations
Nonetheless, given that the scientific evidence appears to indicate that vaccine safety is
not as firmly established as often believed, it would seem ill advised to exclude pediatric
vaccinations as a possible cause of adverse long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes, including
those associated with autism.
The list regarding the concerns about aluminum goes on and on.
Again, a growing number of studies have clearly demonstrated aluminum adjuvants in vaccines
could be a factor in the development of serious autoimmune outcomes in humans.
Moreover, we know, from the work of Richard Flarend, that aluminum is commonly absorbed
into the body � into areas it shouldn�t be � and has been found in various urine
samples from multiple studies examining this topic� and that�s not just for aluminum
in vaccines.
�We increasingly have this compound that was not part of any biochemical process on
Earth, that can now only go and do havoc, which is exactly what it does. It causes all
kinds of unusual biochemical reactions.� � Dr. Chris Shaw, a neuroscientist and professor
at the University of British Columbia
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét