Waching daily Jan 27 2017

DURING THE 2016 ELECTION BOTH GOOGLE AND FACEBOOK GOT A

CONSIDERABLE AMOUNT OF CRITICISM FOR NOT DOING ENOUGH TO

STOP THE SPREADING OF FAKE NEWS.

NOW GOOGLE AND FACEBOOK HAVE BOTH IMPLEMENTED CERTAIN

POLICIES THAT GO AFTER WEBSITES OR PAGES THAT HAVE MISLEADING OR

INTENTIONALLY MISLEADING INFORMATION ABOUT CERTAIN

PEOPLE.

THEY ALSO ARE TARGETING WEBSITES THAT TRIED TO POSE AS

OTHER MEDIA OUTLETS.

IT IS GOOD THAT IT IS NOW ON THEIR RADAR AND THEY WANT

TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT, BUT SOME OF IT, SOME OF THOSE

POLICIES MIGHT HAVE SOME ISSUES.

GOOGLE JUST ANNOUNCED THAT IT TOOK ACTION AGAINST 340

SITES THAT DECEIVE PEOPLE WITH THEIR CONTENT INCLUDING

PURVEYORS OF FAKE NEWS IN 2016.

CLOSE TO 200

OF THESE SITES ARE NO LONGER ALLOWED TO USE GOOGLE ADS.

THEY HAVEN'T BEEN BANNED.

THEY WILL STILL POSSIBLY POP UP IN THE GOOGLE SEARCH ENGINE,

THAT THEY ARE NOT ALLOWING ADSENSE WHICH MONETIZES THESE

PAGES TO BE UTILIZED ON THE PAGES.

GOOGLE DOES NOT CONTROL THE INTERNET.

GOOGLE DOESN'T OWN THE INTERNET, IT MIGHT SEEM LIKE IT AT

TIMES BUT IT DOESN'T. WHAT IT DOES DO IS IT POWERS THE

INTERNET THROUGH MONETIZING IT AND IT IS THROUGH ADSENSE.

WHEN THEY TURN THAT OFF, WE WILL SEE HOW MUCH IT AFFECTS THINGS

BECAUSE IF THEY WERE USING AS A BUSINESS MODEL GOOGLE MIGHT'VE

JUST KILLED THEIR BUSINESS MODEL SO THAT MIGHT HELP IN BRINGING

DOWN THE NUMBER OF FAKE NEWS SITES BUT IF IT TURNS OUT PEOPLE

ARE USING IT TO FOR PROPAGANDA, THEY WOULD PAY FOR THAT ANYWAY

BECAUSE FOR THEM, THE OBJECTIVE IS NOT TO MAKE MONEY, IT IS TO

INFLUENCE ELECTIONS OR POPULAR CULTURE OR THE MEDIA.

SO THEY ARE ESSENTIALLY SQUEEZING SOME OF THE

REVENUE THAT THESE PAGES COULD GET.

UNDERSTAND, THE ONLY OTHER WAY THAT SOME OF THESE PAGES

COULD GET THE REVENUE AS IF THEY FIND SPONSORS AND I THINK A LOT

OF ADVERTISERS STAY AWAY FROM THESE TYPES OF WEBSITES ANYWAY.

NO ADVERTISER IS GOING TO GO NEAR THAT DOCK

NO INVESTOR IS GOING TO INVEST IN THAT, LET'S KEEP IT 100.

THERE WAS A PERIOD ON THE INTERNET WHEN PEOPLE WOULD

INVEST IN CLOWNISH THINGS LIKE SOME WEBSITES WOULD TAKE

OTHER PEOPLE'S ARTICLES AND JUST JUMBLE THE WORDS THAT

PEOPLE WOULD SEARCH WERE BECAUSE THEY WERE LOOKING FOR THE

SAME WORDS AND THEN THEY WOULD ACCRUE SOME MONEY AND THEY

WOULD GET ADS AND PEOPLE PAID MONEY TO BUY THOSE

COMPANIES THAT I THOUGHT THEY WERE MENTAL AND I WAS RIGHT.

HERE AFTER BUYING ONE OF THOSE COMPANIES, ONE OF THE MAJOR

MEDIA COMPANIES IMMEDIATELY SOUGHT IT DOWN TO IT AS

WORD SALAD.

SHOCKINGLY ENOUGH, IT TURNS OUT NOT ALL MEDIA COMPANIES ARE

GENIUSES AND DON'T SEEM TO MAKE THE RIGHT DECISION EVERY

TIME BUT THIS IS DIFFERENT THAT NOBODY IS GOING TO GO INTO

AN INVESTOR MEETING AND SAY OUR GUYS, WE HAVE A BUNCH OF FAKE

NEWS AND WE TREAT PEOPLE WITH THAT WE LIVE THEM ALL THE TIME.

YOU GUYS WANT TO INVEST?

BY THE WAY, I WANT TO BE CLEAR ABOUT SOMETHING.

THEY'RE NOT ONLY TARGETING FAKE NEWS AND BY THE WAY, GOOGLE

WAS VERY CAREFUL NOT TO USE THE PHRASE FAKE NEWS WHEN THEY

MADE THEIR ANNOUNCEMENT THAT THEY ARE GOING AFTER

INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE INTENTIONALLY MISLEADING

THE PUBLIC AND ALSO ADVERTISING SCAMMERS.

ADS THAT SCAM PEOPLE ABOUT WEIGHT LOSS PRODUCTS AND

THINGS LIKE THAT DOCK

AND PEOPLE PRETENDING TO BE THINGS THAT THEY ARE NOT, LIKE

STAR BOOKS.

WE SELL COFFEE AND WE HAVE A MERMAID WITH THREE THINGS

THAT DOCK

HE IS JUST USING THAT AS A HYPOTHETICAL.

THAT IS NOT AN ACTUAL THING.

AT LEAST NOT THAT I KNOW OF.

HERE IS THE ONLY PROBLEM, AND I DON'T KNOW, MAYBE YOU

DISAGREE WITH ME ON THIS.

200 OF THESE PAGES HAVE NOW BEEN PERMANENTLY BANNED FROM

USING GOOGLE ADSENSE AND MAKING REVENUE THROUGH THAT PLATFORM.

WE DON'T KNOW WHO THE ARBITERS ARE BEHIND-THE-SCENES AND

WE ALSO DON'T KNOW WHICH WEBSITES HAVE NOW BEEN

PERMANENTLY BANNED AND SO THAT WORRIES ME A LITTLE BIT.

I HEAR YOU.

IF IT GOES FURTHER, I START GETTING DEEPLY CONCERNED

BECAUSE REMEMBER, THE MEDIA THINKS, THE MAINSTREAM

MEDIA THINKS THAT THEY DON'T HAVE A BIAS, BUT THEY DO.

IT'S NOT A CONSERVATIVE OR LIBERAL ONE, IT IS AN

ESTABLISHMENT BY US.

THEY VIEW THE WORLD THROUGH THE PRISM OF INSIDERS AND

BASICALLY THE MAJOR CITIES THAT THEY LIVE IN WASHINGTON NEW

YORK LA IN SEPARATE CISCO.

THEY THINK THAT THE SYSTEM IS FINE AND THE STATUS QUO IS

FINE AND THE GOVERNMENT LARGELY TELLS THE TRUTH ARE ALMOST

ALWAYS TELLS THE TRUTH UNTIL TRUMP CAME AND THAT THE

PENTAGON IS WONDERFUL, ETC.

IF YOU WERE TO SAY I DON'T BELIEVE THE GOVERNMENT ON

CERTAIN THINGS THEY MIGHT SAY, CONSPIRACY THEORISTS.

THAT IS THEIR WORLDVIEW.

NOW THEY START BANNING THAT STUFF, THAT IS CRAZY TALK.

BECAUSE THEIR PERSPECTIVE IS NOT THE ONLY CORRECT

PERSPECTIVE, EVEN FOR GUYS THAT ARE MENTAL LIKE ALEX JONES.

HE IS B MENTAL.

I JUST REALIZED SOMETHING.

INFO WARS PEDALS RIDICULOUS CONSPIRACY THEORIES THAT

ARE NOT BASED ON FACT IT ALL.

THE WHOLE PIZZA GATE THING, THEY WERE ESSENTIAL IN SPREADING

THAT RIDICULOUS CONSPIRACY THEORY THAT COULD'VE GOTTEN

PEOPLE KILLED BY THE WAY.

THINK ABOUT WHERE INFO WARS MAKE SOME REVENUE OR

CONSIDERABLE MATTER OF REVENUE.

YOUTUBE WHICH IS OWNED BY YOU GOOGLE.

I HEAR YOU.

HOPE THEY DON'T GO IN THAT DIRECTION BECAUSE AS MUCH

OF A LIMIT TAKE AS ALEX JONES IS AND IS MUCH AS MOST OF HIS

PROGRAM WITH OUTRIGHT FABRICATIONS, THAT IS LIKE

THEIR OPINION MAN THOUGHT TO ME THERE IS A DIFFERENCE

BETWEEN I PUBLISHED A STORY THAT I KNEW TO BE INCORRECT LIKE

HARRY REID IS NOW AN ELVIS PERSON EIGHT ARE IN VEGAS.

FUN, BUT NOT SURE.

ON THE OTHER HAND ANA, THAT IS WHY THIS IS A LITTLE BIT

DANGEROUS AND A VERY CHALLENGING QUESTION BECAUSE IN THE

MIDDLE OF SAYING THAT I REMEMBERED, ALEX JONES TOLD

A LIE ABOUT HARRY REID THAT WAS MUCH WORSE.

HE SAID HE WAS BEHIND SANDY HOOK BEING A FALSE FLAG OPERATION.

THAT IS WHAT I'M SAYING THOUGH.

HAS ALEX JONES AT SOME POINT REPORTED STORIES THAT MIGHT

BE ACCURATE?

SURE.

BUT HE ALSO INTENTIONALLY MISLEADS THE PUBLIC ABOUT

THINGS THAT ARE DANGEROUS.

THAT IS THE OTHER PROBLEM AS TO WHY THIS IS A TRICKY ISSUE,

BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW WHERE ALEX JONES ACTUALLY THINKS.

HE IS THE RAVINGS OF A LUNATIC MY DOC LIKE SEEN WHAT HE THINKS.

SORRY TO BRING IT UP, BUT THINK ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED AT THE

RNC AND HOW HE THEY PREMEDITATED AND PLAN THAT OUT.

THEY COMPLETELY MANIPULATED THE DISCUSSION IN THE MEDIA

ABOUT WHAT THEY DID.

THEY HAD ONE OF THEIR PEOPLE LEAD THEM ONTO A STAGE IN

PERSON LIKE THAT INDIVIDUAL WAS ONE OF OUR PRODUCERS AND

THAT THEY WERE INVITED ONTO A STAGE.

THEY DO INTENTIONAL THINGS TO LIE TO PEOPLE TO

YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT ABOUT THAT.

LET ME MAKE THE DISTINCTIONS.

WE KNOW THEIR PERSONAL EXPERIENCE THAT THEY ARE BRAZEN

LIARS AND THEY HAVE NO ATTACHMENT TO THE TRUTH BECAUSE

AS ANA POINTED OUT, THEY PRETENDED THAT ONE OF THEIR OWN

PRODUCERS WAS A PRODUCER AND INVITED THEM ONTO THE STAGE AND

AFTERWARD THEY SAID WITH A STRAIGHT FACE, THEY INVITED

US ON.

CABLE THEY DID THIS, I'M GOING TO TAKE MY SHIRT OFF.

AND THEN THEY REFERRED TO, AND YOU SEE ON THE VIDEOTAPE,

IT IS THEIR PRODUCER, NONE OF OUR PRODUCERS ASKED THEM TO

BEYOND THAT YOU SEE WHO IT IS.

ANYWAY, WHETHER YOU BELIEVE US OR THEM, A POINT IS WE KNOW

AND WE KNOW THAT HE KNOWS.

HE KNOWS IT IS HIS OWN PRODUCER AND HE LIES ABOUT IT

WITHOUT BLINKING.

THE FLIPSIDE IS HE IS FULL-BLOWN MENTAL.

REMEMBER THE THINGS THAT HE SAID I WANT TO GO TO SPACE.

WE ARE UNDER ATTACK.

IT IS AN ALIEN FORCE NOT OF THIS WORLD.

IT'S THE DEVIL, OKAY?

IF YOU WATCH THE WHOLE CLIP THAT WE SHOWED, HE REALLY

BELIEVES THAT THE EARTH IS UNDER ATTACK BY ALIENS AND THE DEVIL.

CUCKOO FOR COCOA PUFFS.

ON THE OTHER HAND, IT'S A FREE COUNTRY AND YOU'RE ALLOWED

TO BE MENTAL.

I WOULDN'T WANT THEM SITTING DOWN INFO WARS, I THINK

THAT IS VERY SCARY TALK.

OF COURSE YOU ARE ALLOWED TO BE MENTAL, YOUR MENTAL

STATEMENTS, AS LONG AS THEY DON'T SAY VIOLENCE AND I'M THINK

AT SOME CASES HE DOESN'T SAY VIOLENCE, GOOGLE IS A

PRIVATE COMPANY.

THEY CAN MAKE WHATEVER BUSINESS DECISION THEY WANT TO MAKE DIVE

THEY WATCH INFO WORSE COVERAGE AND THEY REALIZE THAT THIS IS

ACTUALLY DANGEROUS, MISLEADING, GOOGLE CAN MAKE THAT DECISION.

GOOGLE CERTAINLY CAN'T DIE IF I WAS ADVISING GOOGLE, I

THINK I WOULD TELL THEM NOT TO, BUT I AM NOT ADVISING THEM

AND THAT IS LIKE MY OPINION, MAN THOUGHT THAT IS WHY YOUR

ORIGINAL POINTS IS A GREAT ONE.

IF THEY ARE JUST GETTING RID OF THINGS THAT ARE OBVIOUSLY

FAKE IT SEEMS LIKE IT'S A GOOD THING AND I AGREE WITH IT,

BUT IT DOES START TO GO DOWN THE SLOPE THAT IS A LITTLE DANGEROUS

AS TO WHO'S THE ARBITER OF WHAT'S REAL AND WHAT'S NOT.

THEY CERTAINLY DON'T HAVE TO GIVE MONEY THROUGH ADSENSE

TO PEOPLE THAT THEY THINK ARE MAKING THINGS UP AND ARE

IMPERSONATING OTHER PEOPLE IN ALL OF THE OTHER THINGS

THAT THEY POINT OUT HERE.